Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551397›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Influence of genetic variants in TPMT and COMT associated with cisplatin induced hearing loss in patients with cancer: two new cohorts and a meta-analysis reveal significant heterogeneity between cohorts.

Melanie M Hagleitner, Marieke J H Coenen, Ana Patino-Garcia, Eveline S J M de Bont, Anna Gonzalez-Neira, Hanneke I Vos, Frank N van Leeuwen, Hans Gelderblom, Peter M Hoogerbrugge, Henk-Jan Guchelaar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Platinum-induced hearing loss after treatment for childhood cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetic and Modifiable Risk Factors Contributing to Cisplatin-induced Toxicities.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Ototoxicity: A Challenge in Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of audiology & otology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie M HagleitnerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke J H CoenenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ana Patino-GarciaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Navarra and University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Eveline S J M de BontDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anna Gonzalez-NeiraHuman Genotyping Unit-CeGen, Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
Hanneke I VosDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frank N van LeeuwenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter M HoogerbruggeDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henk-Jan GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maroeska W M Te LooDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens causes hearing loss in 40-60% of cancer patients. It has been suggested that genetic variants in the genes encoding thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) can predict the development of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and may explain interindividual variability in sensitivity to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Two recently published studies however, sought to validate these findings and showed inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of polymorphisms in the TPMT and COMT genes in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Therefore we investigated two independent cohorts of 110 Dutch and 38 Spanish patients with osteosarcoma and performed a meta-analysis including all previously published studies resulting in a total population of 664 patients with cancer. With this largest meta-analysis performed to date, we show that the influence of TPMT and COMT on the development of cisplatin-induced hearing loss may be less important than previously suggested.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseChildChild, PreschoolCisplatinFemaleGenotypeHearing LossHumansMaleMethyltransferasesNetherlandsOsteosarcomaAntineoplastic AgentsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCisplatinCOMT protein, humanMethyltransferasesthiopurine methyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID25551397
PMCPMC4281251
OpenAlexW2072256929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.