Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551281›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2014

Integrative network analysis of TCGA data for ovarian cancer.

Qingyang Zhang, Joanna E Burdette, Ji-Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GalNAc-Transferases in Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The hallmarks of ovarian cancer: Focus on angiogenesis and micro-environment and new models for their characterisation.EJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.] · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Esophageal carcinoma: Towards targeted therapies.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208, USA. qingyangzhang2015@u.northwestern.edu.
Joanna E BurdetteDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois, Chicago, 60607, IL, USA. joannab@uic.edu.
Ji-Ping WangDepartment of Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208, USA. jzwang@northwestern.edu.

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143869 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MARKO, JOHN F · 2009 to 2013
$12.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143869NCI NIH HHS U54CA143869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past years, tremendous efforts have been made to elucidate the molecular basis of the initiation and progression of ovarian cancer. However, most existing studies have been focused on individual genes or a single type of data, which may lack the power to detect the complex mechanisms of cancer formation by overlooking the interactions of different genetic and epigenetic factors.

resultsWe propose an integrative framework to identify genetic and epigenetic features related to ovarian cancer and to quantify the causal relationships among these features using a probabilistic graphical model based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. In the feature selection, we first defined a set of seed genes by including 48 candidate tumor suppressors or oncogenes and an additional 20 ovarian cancer related genes reported in the literature. The seed genes were then fed into a stepwise correlation-based selector to identify 271 additional features including 177 genes, 82 copy number variation sites, 11 methylation sites and 1 somatic mutation (at gene TP53). We built a Bayesian network model with a logit link function to quantify the causal relationships among these features and discovered a set of 13 hub genes including ARID1A, C19orf53, CSKN2A1 and COL5A2. The directed graph revealed many potential genetic pathways, some of which confirmed the existing results in the literature. Clustering analysis further suggested four gene clusters, three of which correspond to well-defined cellular processes including cell division, tumor invasion and mitochondrial system. In addition, two genes related to glycoprotein synthesis, PSG11 and GALNT10, were found highly predictive for the overall survival time of ovarian cancer patients.

conclusionsThe proposed framework is effective in identifying possible important genetic and epigenetic features that are related to complex cancer diseases. The constructed Bayesian network has identified some new genetic/epigenetic pathways, which may shed new light into the molecular mechanisms of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAgedCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationEpigenomicsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedMultigene FamilyMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPromoter Regions, GeneticSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25551281
PMCPMC4331442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.