Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551231›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The study of fingerprint characteristics of Dayi Pu-Erh tea using a fully automatic HS-SPME/GC-MS and combined chemometrics method.

Shidong Lv, Yuanshuang Wu, Jiangsheng Zhou, Ming Lian, Changwen Li, Yongquan Xu, Shunhang Liu, Chao Wang, Qingxiong Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Aroma Difference Analysis of Partridge Tea (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in Volatiles of Teas.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shidong LvFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China; Kunming Grain & Oil and Feed Product Quality Inspection Center, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yuanshuang WuFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jiangsheng ZhouFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Ming LianFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Changwen LiYunnan Tasly Deepure Biology Tea Technology Limited Incorporation, Puer, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yongquan XuYunnan Tasly Deepure Biology Tea Technology Limited Incorporation, Puer, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Shunhang LiuYunnan Tasly Deepure Biology Tea Technology Limited Incorporation, Puer, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Chao WangYunnan Tasly Deepure Biology Tea Technology Limited Incorporation, Puer, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Qingxiong MengFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of tea is presently evaluated by the sensory assessment of professional tea tasters, however, this approach is both inconsistent and inaccurate. A more standardized and efficient method is urgently needed to objectively evaluate tea quality. In this study, the chemical fingerprint of 7 different Dayi Pu-erh tea brands and 3 different Ya'an tea brands on the market were analyzed using fully automatic headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A total of 78 volatiles were separated, among 75 volatiles were identified by GC-MS in seven Dayi Pu-erh teas, and the major chemical components included methoxyphenolic compounds, hydrocarbons, and alcohol compounds, such as 1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene, 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-pentadecane, linalool and its oxides, α-terpineol, and phytol. The overlapping ratio of peaks (ORP) of the chromatogram in the seven Dayi Pu-erh tea samples was greater than 89.55%, whereas the ORP of Ya'an tea samples was less than 79.10%. The similarity and differences of the Dayi Pu-erh tea samples were also characterized using correlation coefficient similarity and principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that the correlation coefficient of similarity of the seven Dayi Pu-erh tea samples was greater than 0.820 and was gathered in a specific area, which showed that samples from different brands were basically the same, despite have some slightly differences of chemical indexes was found. These results showed that the GC-MS fingerprint combined with the PCA approach can be used as an effective tool for the quality assessment and control of Pu-erh tea.

Indexed as

Food QualityCamellia sinensisGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSolid Phase MicroextractionTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID25551231
PMCPMC4281233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.