Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Comparison of human induced pluripotent stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes with human mesenchymal stem cells following acute myocardial infarction.

Lucas Citro, Shan Naidu, Fatemat Hassan, M Lakshmi Kuppusamy, Periannan Kuppusamy, Mark G Angelos, Mahmood Khan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Stem Cells in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Induced pluripotent stem cell-based therapies for organ fibrosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas CitroDavis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America.
Shan NaiduDavis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America.
Fatemat HassanDavis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America.
M Lakshmi KuppusamyDepartment of Radiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, 03766, United States of America.
Periannan KuppusamyDepartment of Radiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, 03766, United States of America.
Mark G AngelosDavis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America.
Mahmood KhanDavis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States of America.
The Ohio State University · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHuman induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have recently been shown to express key cardiac proteins and improve in vivo cardiac function when administered following myocardial infarction. However, the efficacy of hiPSC-derived cell therapies, in direct comparison to current, well-established stem cell-based therapies, is yet to be elucidated. The goal of the current study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) with hiPSC-CMs in mitigating myocardial infarction (MI).

methodsMale athymic nude hyrats were subjected to permanent ligation of the left-anterior-descending (LAD) coronary artery to induce acute MI. Four experimental groups were studied: 1) control (non-MI), 2) MI, 3) hMSCs (MI+MSC), and 4) hiPSC-CMs (MI+hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes). The hiPSC-CMs and hMSCs were labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) in vitro to track the transplanted cells in the ischemic heart by high-field cardiac MRI. These cells were injected into the ischemic heart 30-min after LAD ligation. Four-weeks after MI, cardiac MRI was performed to track the transplanted cells in the infarct heart. Additionally, echocardiography (M-mode) was performed to evaluate the cardiac function. Immunohistological and western blot studies were performed to assess the cell tracking, engraftment and cardiac fibrosis in the infarct heart tissues.

resultsEchocardiography data showed a significantly improved cardiac function in the hiPSC-CMs and hMSCs groups, when compared to MI. Immunohistological studies showed expression of connexin-43, α-actinin and myosin heavy chain in engrafted hiPSC-CMs. Cardiac fibrosis was significantly decreased in hiPSC-CMs group when compared to hMSCs or MI groups. Overall, this study demonstrated improved cardiac function with decreased fibrosis with both hiPSC-CMs and hMSCs groups when compared with MI group.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBiomarkersCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacRats, NudeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25551230
PMCPMC4281179
OpenAlexW2037769177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.