Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25551223›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Dispersal pathways and genetic differentiation among worldwide populations of the invasive weed Centaurea solstitialis L. (Asteraceae).

Renée L Eriksen, José L Hierro, Özkan Eren, Krikor Andonian, Katalin Török, Pablo I Becerra, Daniel Montesinos, Liana Khetsuriani, Alecu Diaconu, Rick Kesseli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population structure in chicory (Ecology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Toxicity Assessment ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Renée L EriksenDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
José L HierroInstituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de La Pampa), Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina.
Özkan ErenBiyoloji Bölümü, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Aydın, Turkey.
Krikor AndonianEnvironmental Studies Department, De Anza College, Cupertino, California, United States of America.
Katalin TörökCentre for Ecological Research (MTA ÖK), Vácrátót, Hungary.
Pablo I BecerraDepartamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel MontesinosCentre for Functional Ecology, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Liana KhetsurianiInstitute of Botany, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Alecu DiaconuInstitute of Biological Research, Biological Control Laboratory, Iasi, Romania.
Rick KesseliDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural history of introduced species is often unclear due to a lack of historical records. Even when historical information is readily available, important factors of the invasions such as genetic bottlenecks, hybridization, historical relationships among populations and adaptive changes are left unknown. In this study, we developed a set of nuclear, simple sequence repeat markers and used these to characterize the genetic diversity and population structure among native (Eurasian) and non-native (North and South American) populations of Centaurea solstitialis L., (yellow starthistle). We used these data to test hypotheses about the invasion pathways of the species that were based on historical and geographical records, and we make inferences about historical relationships among populations and demographic processes following invasion. We confirm that the center of diversity and the native range of the species is likely the eastern Mediterranean region in the vicinity of Turkey. From this region, the species likely proceeded to colonize other parts of Europe and Asia via a slow, stepwise range expansion. Spanish populations were the primary source of seed to invade South America via human-mediated events, as was evident from historical records, but populations from the eastern Mediterranean region were also important. North American populations were largely derived from South America, but had secondary contributors. We suggest that the introduction history of non-native populations from disparate parts of the native range have allowed not just one, but multiple opportunities first in South America then again in North America for the creation of novel genotypes via intraspecific hybridization. We propose that multiple intraspecific hybridization events may have created especially potent conditions for the selection of a noxious invader, and may explain differences in genetic patterns among North and South America populations, inferred differences in demographic processes, as well as morphological differences previously reported from common garden experiments.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationIntroduced SpeciesPlant DispersalCentaureaDatabases, GeneticExpressed Sequence TagsGene FrequencyGenetic LociMicrosatellite RepeatsPlant Weeds

Identifiers

PMID25551223
PMCPMC4281129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.