Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25550962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014

Comparison of tomographic and colonoscopic diagnoses in the presence of colonic wall thickening.

Ali Tüzün İnce, Birol Baysal, Yusuf Kayar, Elif Arabacı, Mehmet Bilgin, Jamshid Hamdard, Adnan Yay, Hakan Şentürk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali Tüzün İnceGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Birol BaysalGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Yusuf KayarGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Elif ArabacıGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Mehmet BilginDepartment of Radiology, Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Jamshid HamdardGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Adnan YayGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Hakan ŞentürkGastroenterology Clinic of Bezmialem Vakıf University İstanbul 34093, Turkey.
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveColonic wall thickening is a common condition in a number of benignant and malignant diseases. This study investigated the accuracy of radiological diagnoses in patients diagnosed with colonic wall thickening using multislice CT (MDCT). MATERIALS AND

methodFiles of patients with colonic wall thickening diagnosed with 64-slice MDCT were reviewed retrospectively. The colonoscopy results of these patients were grouped under neoplastic process (cancer and adenomatous polyp), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), diverticulitis and other etiology (nonspecific events, ischemic colitis, solitary rectal ulcer, external compression, secondary to volvulus and radiotherapy), and the results were statistically evaluated. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsThe study was performed on 505 files (290 males [57.4%], 215 females [42.6%], mean age: 49.15 ± 18.4 years). CT and colonoscopic diagnoses were reviewed and the following CT to colonoscopy ratios was observed: neoplastic process: 44.4% vs. 40.2%; IBD: 42.4% vs. 42.4%; diverticulitis: 4% vs. 4.2%; other etiology: 9.3% vs. 3.2%. Colonoscopy failed to identify pathology in 9.9% of the patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CT were 95.6%, 90.4%, 87.1%, 96.8% and 92.4%, respectively, in detecting neoplastic processes; 97.2%, 97.9%, 97.2%, 97.9% and 97.6%, respectively, in detecting IBD; 90.5%, 99.8%, 95%, 99.6% and 99.4%, respectively, in detecting diverticulitis, and 50%, 96,7%, 62.5%, 94.6% and 92%, respectively, in detecting other etiology.

conclusionWhile, accuracy of 64 slice-CT in diagnosing colonic wall thickenings secondary especially to neoplastic processes, IBD and diverticulitis was significantly higher, but differential diagnosis is challenging in pathologies due to other etiologies.

Indexed as

colon cancerColonic wall thicknesscolonoscopyCTdiverticulitispolyp

Identifiers

PMID25550962
PMCPMC4276220
OpenAlexW1915818451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.