Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25550895›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014

The efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a meta-analysis from nine randomized controlled trials.

Qing Zhou, Yaodong Zhou, Hao Chen, Zhen Wang, Zhibing Tang, Jinlian Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. PET/CT Imaging of Human TNFα Using [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qing ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Yaodong ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Zhibing TangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Jinlian LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Jiangsu 215021, China.
Suzhou Kowloon Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCertolizumab pegol (CZP) is a novel anti-TNF agent that is used for patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the efficacy of CZP in RA remains controversial. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of CZP in the treatment of RA patients.

methodsEligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safe of CZP in the patients with active RA. The primary outcome was American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), and secondary outcome were ACR50, ACR70, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and adverse events. A fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to pool the estimates, depending on the absence or presence of heterogeneity among the included studies.

resultsNine RCTs with a total of 5228 patients were included in this meta-analysis, and all of the patients were administered CZP or placebo. The pooled results showed that CZP significantly improved the ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 response rates, and physical function. CZP was associated with a statistically significant reduction in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, arthritis pain, and fatigue. Patients who received CZP treatment did not have a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events, no matter in any intensity.

conclusionsCZP 200 or 400mg in the treatment of active RA significantly reduced the RA signs and symptoms, and improved physical function as compared with the placebo. More large-scale RCTs are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of CZP in the treatment of active RA.

Indexed as

Certolizumab pegolmeta-analysisrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID25550895
PMCPMC4276153
OpenAlexW1622494744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.