ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014
Blood vessel invasion and other variables as predictors of long-term survival in Japanese and British patients with primary invasive breast cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic influence of lymphatic endothelium-specific hyaluronan receptor 1 in cancer: A systematic review.Cancer science · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Significance of the Radiological Relationship between the Tumor and the main blood vessels in Enneking IIB Osteosarcoma of the extremities.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Defining lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer by the proportion of lymphocyte-rich stroma and its significance in routine histopathological diagnosis.Pathology international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to investigate the associations of blood vessel invasion (BVI), lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) or other variables and long-term survival in 173 Japanese and 184 British patients with primary invasive breast cancer, and whether they are associated with survival differences between Japanese and British patients. BVI was detected by objective methods, using both factor VIII-related antigen (F-VIII) staining and elastica van Gieson (E v G) staining. BVI was classified into three subtypes. 1) BVI e, BVI detected by E v G staining alone, 2) BVI f, BVI detected by F-VIII staining alone, 3) BVIef, BVI evaluated by combining BVIf and BVIe. LVI was also detected by objective methods, using lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) staining alone. There was a borderline significance between the frequencies for BVIef of British patients and those of Japanese patients (8.2% vs 3.5%; P = 0.06) but not for LVI (P = 0.36). British patients had a significantly worse relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than Japanese patients (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, respectively) even though their tumors were smaller and more ER-positive with a similar prevalence of lymph-node involvement. LVI was not significantly associated with RFS and OS, however, BVIef positive tumors had a significantly worse RFS and OS compared with BVIef negative patients, after statistical adjustment for the other variables (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, respectively). The present study shows that BVIef variability might contribute to the Japanese and British disparities in breast cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25550840PMC4270576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.