Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2015
Maintenance of remission following 2 years of standard treatment then dose reduction with abatacept in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognosis.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00989235 (A Phase 3B, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Methotrexate-naïve Early Erosive Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Treated With Abatacept Plus Methotrexate Compared With Methotrexate - Low Dose Sub-Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3B, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Methotrexate-naïve Early Erosive Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Treated With Abatacept Plus Methotrexate Compared With Methotrexate - Low Dose Sub-Study
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Reduction of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of tapering targeted therapies (bDMARDs or JAKis) on the risk of serious infections and adverse events of special interest in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: a systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Withdrawal of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical and molecular data to predict flares in DMARD optimization in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Trial
- Article
- Predicting Flare in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic Induced Remission, on Tapering, and on Stable Therapy.ACR open rheumatology · 2024Article
- Defining the Optimal Strategies for Achieving Drug-Free Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Up to 5-year retention of abatacept in Belgian patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: a sub-analysis of the international, observational ACTION study.Rheumatology international · 2020Observational
- Management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2019 updated consensus recommendations from the Hong Kong Society of Rheumatology.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Review
- Abatacept and tocilizumab tapering in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of SONATA-a retrospective, exploratory cohort study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2018Article
- CD28 between tolerance and autoimmunity: the side effects of animal models.F1000Research · 2018Review
- bDMARD Dose Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search.Rheumatology and therapy · 2017Review
- Tapering biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic approach for clinical practice.Clinical rheumatology · 2017Review
- Practical recommendations for the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory diseases.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2017Review
- Protective effect of higenamine ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis through heme oxygenase-1 and PI3K/Akt/Nrf-2 signaling pathways.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Co-stimulation Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Today and Tomorrow.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate maintenance of response while reducing intravenous abatacept dose from ~10 mg/kg to ~5 mg/kg in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved disease activity score (DAS)28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR) <2.6.
methodsThis 1-year, multinational, randomised, double-blind substudy evaluated the efficacy and safety of ~10 mg/kg and ~5 mg/kg abatacept in patients with early RA with poor prognosis who had reached DAS28 (ESR) <2.6 at year 2 of the AGREE study. The primary outcome was time to disease relapse (defined as additional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, ≥2 courses high-dose steroids, return to open-label abatacept ~10 mg/kg, or DAS28 (C reactive protein) ≥3.2 at two consecutive visits).
results108 patients were randomised (~10 mg/kg, n=58; ~5 mg/kg, n=50). Three and five patients, respectively, discontinued, and four per group returned to open-label abatacept. Relapse over time and the proportion of patients relapsing were similar in both groups (31% (~10 mg/kg) vs 34% (~5 mg/kg); HR: 0.87 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.69)). Mean steady-state trough serum concentration for the ~10 mg/kg group was 20.3-24.1 µg/mL, compared with 8.8-12.0 µg/mL for the ~5 mg/kg group.
conclusionsThis exploratory study suggests that abatacept dose reduction may be an option in patients with poor prognosis early RA who achieve DAS28 (ESR) <2.6 after ≥1 year on abatacept (~10 mg/kg). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00989235.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.