Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25550116›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2015

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated colonic diverticulitis: a definitive treatment? Retrospective analysis of 63 cases.

M Sorrentino, M Brizzolari, E Scarpa, D Malisan, F Bruschi, S Bertozzi, S Bernardi, R Petri

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04311385 (Management and Evolution of Acute Diverticulitis With Pericolic Free Gas - a Multicentre Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04311385 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Management and Evolution of Acute Diverticulitis With Pericolic Free Gas - a Multicentre Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Central de la Defensa Gómez UllaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1,000ConditionsDiverticulitis, Diverticulitis Colon, Diverticulitis, Perforation, BowelArmsCT imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Perforated Diverticulitis: a Contemporary Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. An outcome analysis of laparoscopic management of diverticulitis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage: our experience and review of the literature.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M SorrentinoDepartment of General Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Latisana, ASS5 "Bassa Friulana", Via Sabbionera 45, 33053, Latisana, UD, Italy, mariosor3@libero.it.
M Brizzolari
E Scarpa
D Malisan
F Bruschi
S Bertozzi
S Bernardi
R Petri
Ospedale di Latisana · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ideal treatment of perforated diverticulitis and the indications for elective colon resection remain controversial. Considering the significant morbidity and mortality rates related to traditional resection, efforts have been made to reduce the invasiveness of surgery in recent decades. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has emerged as an effective alternative option. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis and the possibility that it could be a definitive treatment.

methodsWe included patients treated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis. The inclusion criteria were all emergency patients with generalized peritonitis due to Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis and some cases of Hinchey II and IV.

resultsSixty-three patients were treated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Six patients (9.5 %) had Hinchey II diverticulitis; 54 patients (85.7 %) had Hinchey III; and three patients (4.8 %) had Hinchey IV. The mean operative time was 87.3 min (±25.4 min), and the overall morbidity rate was 14.3 %. One patient died because of pulmonary embolism, and there were six early reinterventions because of treatment failure. Delayed colon resection was performed in four of the remaining 57 patients (7 %) because of recurrent diverticulitis. In the other 53 patients (93 %), we saw no recurrence of diverticulitis and no intervention was performed after a median follow-up period of 54 months (interquartile range 27-98 months).

conclusionsLaparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis can be considered a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical resection, and using this approach, most elective colon resection might be avoided.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiverticulitis, ColonicFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePeritoneal LavagePeritonitisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25550116
OpenAlexW2031763039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.