Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25549323›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proteomic screening for amyloid proteins.

Anton A Nizhnikov, Alexander I Alexandrov, Tatyana A Ryzhova, Olga V Mitkevich, Alexander A Dergalev, Michael D Ter-Avanesyan, Alexey P Galkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. How Big Is the Yeast Prion Universe?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RopB protein ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Stress Response Is the Main Trigger of Sporadic Amyloidoses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anton A NizhnikovDept. of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia; St. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander I AlexandrovA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana A RyzhovaDept. of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia; St. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Olga V MitkevichA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A DergalevA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Michael D Ter-AvanesyanA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey P GalkinDept. of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia; St. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry · RUSt Petersburg University · RUVavilov Institute of General Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive study, progress in elucidation of biological functions of amyloids and their role in pathology is largely restrained due to the lack of universal and reliable biochemical methods for their discovery. All biochemical methods developed so far allowed only identification of glutamine/asparagine-rich amyloid-forming proteins or proteins comprising amyloids that form large deposits. In this article we present a proteomic approach which may enable identification of a broad range of amyloid-forming proteins independently of specific features of their sequences or levels of expression. This approach is based on the isolation of protein fractions enriched with amyloid aggregates via sedimentation by ultracentrifugation in the presence of strong ionic detergents, such as sarkosyl or SDS. Sedimented proteins are then separated either by 2D difference gel electrophoresis or by SDS-PAGE, if they are insoluble in the buffer used for 2D difference gel electrophoresis, after which they are identified by mass-spectrometry. We validated this approach by detection of known yeast prions and mammalian proteins with established capacity for amyloid formation and also revealed yeast proteins forming detergent-insoluble aggregates in the presence of human huntingtin with expanded polyglutamine domain. Notably, with one exception, all these proteins contained glutamine/asparagine-rich stretches suggesting that their aggregates arose due to polymerization cross-seeding by human huntingtin. Importantly, though the approach was developed in a yeast model, it can easily be applied to any organism thus representing an efficient and universal tool for screening for amyloid proteins.

Indexed as

Amyloidogenic ProteinsAnimalsDetergentsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFungal ProteinsHumansHuntingtin ProteinMass SpectrometryNerve Tissue ProteinsProteomicsSarcosineAmyloidogenic ProteinsDetergentsFungal ProteinsHTT protein, humanHuntingtin ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsSarcosinesarkosyl

Identifiers

PMID25549323
PMCPMC4280166
OpenAlexW1990354947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.