Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25549070›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Generation of genomic deletions in mammalian cell lines via CRISPR/Cas9.

Daniel E Bauer, Matthew C Canver, Stuart H Orkin

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. F26BP enables control of glycolysis rate independent of energy state.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Myogenic Potential inACS omega · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel E BauerHarvard Medical School; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Daniel.Bauer@childrens.harvard.edu.
Matthew C CanverHarvard Medical School.
Stuart H OrkinHarvard Medical School; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; stuart_orkin@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA-1 IN TERMINAL ERYTHROID DEVELOPMENTP01HL032262 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI YIEN, YVETTE Y · 1985 to 2021
$38.9M
CORE--ZEBRAFISHP30DK049216 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ORKIN, STUART H · 1999 to 2015
$14.3M
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF NORMAL AND TYHALASSEMIC DNAR01HL032259 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ORKIN, STUART H · 1985 to 2022
$8.8M
Epigenetic regulation of BCL11A in the hemoglobin switchK08DK093705 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BAUER, DANIEL EVAN · 2012 to 2016
$679k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL032262NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL032259NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL032259NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK093705NIDDK NIH HHS K08DK093705NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK049216NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK049216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) 9 system may be re-purposed for site-specific eukaryotic genome engineering. CRISPR/Cas9 is an inexpensive, facile, and efficient genome editing tool that allows genetic perturbation of genes and genetic elements. Here we present a simple methodology for CRISPR design, cloning, and delivery for the production of genomic deletions. In addition, we describe techniques for deletion, identification, and characterization. This strategy relies on cellular delivery of a pair of chimeric single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to create two double strand breaks (DSBs) at a locus in order to delete the intervening DNA segment by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair. Deletions have potential advantages as compared to single-site small indels given the efficiency of biallelic modification, ease of rapid identification by PCR, predictability of loss-of-function, and utility for the study of non-coding elements. This approach can be used for efficient loss-of-function studies of genes and genetic elements in mammalian cell lines.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene DeletionAnimalsCell LineClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairGenetic EngineeringHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNARNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID25549070
PMCPMC4279820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.