Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25548995›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

A simple and rapid protocol to non-enzymatically dissociate fresh human tissues for the analysis of infiltrating lymphocytes.

Soizic Garaud, Chunyan Gu-Trantien, Jean-Nicolas Lodewyckx, Anaïs Boisson, Pushpamali De Silva, Laurence Buisseret, Edoardo Migliori, Myriam Libin, Céline Naveaux, Hugues Duvillier and 1 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CD4Science advances · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-Density of FcγRIIIAFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soizic GaraudMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Chunyan Gu-TrantienMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Jean-Nicolas LodewyckxMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Anaïs BoissonMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Pushpamali De SilvaMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Laurence BuisseretMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Edoardo MiglioriMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Myriam LibinInstitut d'Immunologie Médicale, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Céline NaveauxMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Hugues DuvillierMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Karen Willard-GalloMolecular Immunology Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Karen.Willard-Gallo@bordet.be.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEInstitut Jules Bordet · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of malignant cells to evade the immune system, characterized by tumor escape from both innate and adaptive immune responses, is now accepted as an important hallmark of cancer. Our research on breast cancer focuses on the active role that tumor infiltrating lymphocytes play in tumor progression and patient outcome. Toward this goal, we developed a methodology for the rapid isolation of intact lymphoid cells from normal and abnormal tissues in an effort to evaluate them proximate to their native state. Homogenates prepared using a mechanical dissociator show both increased viability and cell recovery while preserving surface receptor expression compared to enzyme-digested tissues. Furthermore, enzymatic digestion of the remaining insoluble material did not recover additional CD45(+) cells indicating that quantitative and qualitative measurements in the primary homogenate likely genuinely reflect infiltrating subpopulations in the tissue fragment. The lymphoid cells in these homogenates can be easily characterized using immunological (phenotype, proliferation, etc.) or molecular (DNA, RNA and/or protein) approaches. CD45(+) cells can also be used for subpopulation purification, in vitro expansion or cryopreservation. An additional benefit of this approach is that the primary tissue supernatant from the homogenates can be used to characterize and compare cytokines, chemokines, immunoglobulins and antigens present in normal and malignant tissues. This protocol functions extremely well for human breast tissues and should be applicable to a wide variety of normal and abnormal tissues.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsCytological TechniquesFemaleHumansLeukocyte Common AntigensLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingLeukocyte Common AntigensPTPRC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25548995
PMCPMC4396968
OpenAlexW1993140384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.