Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25548976›Full record

ArticleCellular reprogramming2015

Oxamflatin treatment enhances cloned porcine embryo development and nuclear reprogramming.

Jiude Mao, Ming-Tao Zhao, Kristin M Whitworth, Lee D Spate, Eric M Walters, Chad O'Gorman, Kiho Lee, Melissa S Samuel, Clifton N Murphy, Kevin Wells and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Pigs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and functional resemblance of differentiated cells derived from isogenic human iPSCs and SCNT-derived ESCs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Artificial cloning of domestic animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiude Mao1 National Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO, 65211.
Ming-Tao Zhao
Kristin M Whitworth
Lee D Spate
Eric M Walters
Chad O'Gorman
Kiho Lee
Melissa S Samuel
Clifton N Murphy
Kevin Wells
Rocio M Rivera
Randall S Prather
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Resource Core for National Swine Resource and Research Center (NSRRC) Years 21-25U42OD011140 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI RANDALL S PRATHER · 2012 to 2026
$26.7M
NSRRC SUPPLEMENT FOR DUKE CTSA COLLABORATIONU42RR018877 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI RILEY, LELA K. · 2003 to 2011
$13.4M
NCRR NIH HHS RR018877NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR018877NIH HHS U42 OD011140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faulty epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nuclei is thought to be the main reason for low cloning efficiency by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as Scriptaid, improve developmental competence of SCNT embryos in several species. Another HDACi, Oxamflatin, is about 100 times more potent than Scriptaid in the ability to inhibit nuclear-specific HDACs. The present study determined the effects of Oxamflatin treatment on embryo development, DNA methylation, and gene expression. Oxamflatin treatment enhanced blastocyst formation of SCNT embryos in vitro. Embryo transfer produced more pigs born and fewer mummies from the Oxamflatin-treated group compared to the Scriptaid-treated positive control. Oxamflatin also decreased DNA methylation of POU5F1 regulatory elements and centromeric repeat elements in day-7 blastocysts. When compared to in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryos, the methylation status of POU5F1, NANOG, and centromeric repeat was similar in the cloned embryos, indicating these genes were successfully reprogrammed. However, compared to the lack of methylation of XIST in day-7 IVF embryos, a higher methylation level in day-7 cloned embryos was observed, implying that X chromosomes were activated in day-7 IVF blastocysts, but were not fully activated in cloned embryos, i.e., reprogramming of XIST was delayed. A time-course analysis of XIST DNA methylation on day-13, -15, -17, and -19 in vivo embryos revealed that XIST methylation initiated at about day 13 and was not completed by day 19. The methylation of the XIST gene in day-19 control cloned embryos was delayed again when compared to in vivo embryos. However, methylation of XIST in Oxamflatin-treated embryos was comparable with in vivo embryos, which further demonstrated that Oxamflatin could accelerate the delayed reprogramming of XIST gene and thus might improve cloning efficiency.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCellular ReprogrammingCloning, OrganismDNA MethylationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHomeodomain ProteinsHydroxamic AcidsHydroxylaminesMaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesOctamer Transcription Factor-3Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsHomeodomain ProteinsHydroxamic AcidsHydroxylaminesOctamer Transcription Factor-3oxamflatinQuinolinesRNA, Long NoncodingscriptaidXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID25548976
PMCPMC4312790
OpenAlexW2335576520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.