Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25548955›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Methods for skin wounding and assays for wound responses in C. elegans.

Suhong Xu, Andrew D Chisholm

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From wound response to repair - lessons from C. elegans.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  8. WoundingBio-protocol · 2021
    Article
  9. Wound healing, cellular regeneration and plasticity: the elegans way.The International journal of developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suhong XuDivision of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego.
Andrew D ChisholmDivision of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego; chisholm@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of Tissue Morphogenesis in C. elegansR01GM054657 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI CHISHOLM, ANDREW D · 1997 to 2018
$5.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The C. elegans epidermis and cuticle form a simple yet sophisticated skin layer that can repair localized damage resulting from wounding. Studies of wound responses and repair in this model have illuminated our understanding of the cytoskeletal and genomic responses to tissue damage. The two most commonly used methods to wound the C. elegans adult skin are pricks with microinjection needles, and local laser irradiation. Needle wounding locally disrupts the cuticle, epidermis, and associated extracellular matrix, and may also damage internal tissues. Laser irradiation results in more localized damage. Wounding triggers a succession of readily assayed responses including elevated epidermal Ca(2+) (seconds-minutes), formation and closure of an actin-containing ring at the wound site (1-2 hr), elevated transcription of antimicrobial peptide genes (2-24 hr), and scar formation. Essentially all wild type adult animals survive wounding, whereas mutants defective in wound repair or other responses show decreased survival. Detailed protocols for needle and laser wounding, and assays for quantitation and visualization of wound responses and repair processes (Ca dynamics, actin dynamics, antimicrobial peptide induction, and survival) are presented.

Indexed as

Biological AssayCaenorhabditis elegansActinsAnimalsCytoskeletonEpidermisWound HealingActins

Identifiers

PMID25548955
PMCPMC4396949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.