Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25548877›Full record

ArticleZebrafish2015

Use of gnotobiotic zebrafish to study Vibrio anguillarum pathogenicity.

Usua Oyarbide, Iñaki Iturria, Sandra Rainieri, Miguel Angel Pardo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zebrafish, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Probiotic Yeasts andFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Zebrafish Models for Pathogenic Vibrios.Journal of bacteriology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Zebrafish as a Model for Fish Diseases in Aquaculture.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. β-Glucan-ProducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Protective Yeasts ControlFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Usua OyarbideFood Research Division, Azti-Tecnalia , Derio, Spain .
Iñaki Iturria
Sandra Rainieri
Miguel Angel Pardo
AZTI · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the use of the gnotobiotic zebrafish system to study the effects of bacterial infection, and analyzed expression of genes involved in zebrafish innate immunity. Using a GFP-labeled strain of Vibrio anguillarum, we fluorescently monitored colonization of the zebrafish intestinal tract and used gene expression analysis to compare changes in genes involved in innate immunity between nongnotobiotic and gnotobiotic larvae. The experiments performed with the gnotobiotic zebrafish reveal new insights into V. anguillarum pathogenesis. Specifically, an alteration of the host immune system was detected through the suppression of a number of innate immune genes (NFKB, IL1B, TLR4, MPX, and TRF) during the first 3 h post infection. This immunomodulation can be indicative of a "stealth mechanism" of mucus invasion in which the pathogen found a sheltered niche, a typical trait of intracellular pathogens.

Indexed as

Germ-Free LifeAnimalsFish DiseasesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImmunity, InnateLarvaVibrioVibrio InfectionsVirulenceZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25548877
PMCPMC4298153
OpenAlexW2321918425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.