Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25548172›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Antiviral immunity of Anopheles gambiae is highly compartmentalized, with distinct roles for RNA interference and gut microbiota.

Guillaume Carissimo, Emilie Pondeville, Melanie McFarlane, Isabelle Dietrich, Christian Mitri, Emmanuel Bischoff, Christophe Antoniewski, Catherine Bourgouin, Anna-Bella Failloux, Alain Kohl and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. How infection-triggered pathobionts influence virulence evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Symbiotic Bacteria ModulateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Rift Valley Fever Virus Primes Immune Responses inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillaume CarissimoUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France; Graduate School of Life Sciences ED515, Sorbonne Universités UPMC Paris VI, 75252 Paris, France.
Emilie PondevilleUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France; MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom;
Melanie McFarlaneMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom;
Isabelle DietrichMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom;
Christian MitriUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France;
Emmanuel BischoffUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France;
Christophe AntoniewskiDrosophila Genetics and Epigenetics, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, CNRS UMR 7622-Biologie du Développement, 75252 Paris, France; and.
Catherine BourgouinUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France;
Anna-Bella FaillouxLaboratory of Arbovirus and Insect Vectors, Department of Virology Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, Cedex 15, France;
Alain KohlMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom;
Kenneth D VernickUnit of Genetics and Genomics of Insect Vectors, Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors and CNRS Unit of Hosts, Vectors, and Pathogens, Unité de Recherche Associée 3012, Paris, France; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55108; kvernick@pasteur.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A550_1031Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arboviruses are transmitted by mosquitoes and other arthropods to humans and animals. The risk associated with these viruses is increasing worldwide, including new emergence in Europe and the Americas. Anopheline mosquitoes are vectors of human malaria but are believed to transmit one known arbovirus, o'nyong-nyong virus, whereas Aedes mosquitoes transmit many. Anopheles interactions with viruses have been little studied, and the initial antiviral response in the midgut has not been examined. Here, we determine the antiviral immune pathways of the Anopheles gambiae midgut, the initial site of viral infection after an infective blood meal. We compare them with the responses of the post-midgut systemic compartment, which is the site of the subsequent disseminated viral infection. Normal viral infection of the midgut requires bacterial flora and is inhibited by the activities of immune deficiency (Imd), JAK/STAT, and Leu-rich repeat immune factors. We show that the exogenous siRNA pathway, thought of as the canonical mosquito antiviral pathway, plays no detectable role in antiviral defense in the midgut but only protects later in the systemic compartment. These results alter the prevailing antiviral paradigm by describing distinct protective mechanisms in different body compartments and infection stages. Importantly, the presence of the midgut bacterial flora is required for full viral infectivity to Anopheles, in contrast to malaria infection, where the presence of the midgut bacterial flora is required for protection against infection. Thus, the enteric flora controls a reciprocal protection tradeoff in the vector for resistance to different human pathogens.

Indexed as

Alphavirus InfectionsAnimalsAnophelesArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsDigestive SystemFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInsect VectorsJanus KinasesMicrobiotaO'nyong-nyong VirusPlasmodium falciparumRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingJanus KinasesRNA, Small InterferingSTAT Transcription Factorsarbovirushost–pathogen interactionsinnate immunityinsect immunitymalaria

Identifiers

PMID25548172
PMCPMC4299212
OpenAlexW1981107494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.