SynthesisJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2015
Efficacy and safety of galantamine treatment for patients with Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rapid health technology assessment of galantamine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A review.Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Phytochemical Characterization and Evaluation of the Anticholinesterase and Anti-Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Natural Chiral Scaffolds in Alzheimer's Disease: Therapeutic Potential, Mechanism, and Clinical Aspects.BioMed research international · 2026Review
- Galantamine-Memantine Combination in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Dementia.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Alzheimer's disease: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, risk factors, symptoms diagnosis, management, caregiving, advanced treatments and associated challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Alzheimer's disease and its treatment-yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Therapeutic and medicinal effects of snowdrop (Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Review
- Therapeutic approaches for improving cognitive function in the aging brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Is Aducanumab for LMICs? Promises and Challenges.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Pharmacological aspects of galantamine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.EXCLI journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholinesterase inhibitors treatment is considered as a common therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's disease (AD) by numerous reported studies, but the role of currently available drugs for AD is still controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galantamine for the treatment of AD, and provide the basis and reference for clinical rational drug use. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of galantamine for AD published up to April 30, 2014 were searched. A random or fixed-effect model was used to analyze outcomes which were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean difference (MD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by Q test and I(2) statistic. The outcome measurements were as follows: the changes of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Clinicians' Interview-Based Impression of Change with Caregiver's Input (CIBIC+), adverse effects and dropouts. Eleven articles with 4,074 participants were included. Administration of galantamine for 8-28 weeks (16-40 mg daily) led to significant improvements in ADAS-cog score [P < 0.00001, MD = -2.95, 95 % CI (-3.32, -2.57)], MMSE score [P = 0.003, MD = 2.50, 95 % CI (0.86, 4.15)], NPI score [P = 0.001, MD = -1.58, 95 % CI (-2.54, -0.62)], and CIBIC+ scale [P < 0.00001, RR = 1.26, 95 % CI (1.15, 1.39)], but not in ADL score [P = 0.43, MD = 0.71, 95 % CI (-1.07, 2.48)]. More adverse events and dropouts occurred in the galantamine group than that in the placebo group, the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Galantamine could significantly improve cognitive, behavioral, and global performances in patients with AD. In addition, we need to use it with caution in the clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25547862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.