Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25547776›Full record

Trial reportNeuroRehabilitation2015

Feasibility of using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to enhance treatment outcomes in persons with aphasia.

Jessica Richardson, Abhishek Datta, Jacek Dmochowski, Lucas C Parra, Julius Fridriksson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroRehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03805659 (High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03805659 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) in Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA): Effects on Language and Neural Mechanisms

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2020 to 2022Enrolled6ConditionsPrimary Progressive AphasiaArmsHD-tDCS, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Rapid cortical mapping with cross-participant encoding models.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica RichardsonDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Abhishek DattaSoterix Medical, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Jacek DmochowskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Lucas C ParraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Aphasia: Phase II TrialU01DC011739 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
Neural Predictors of Anomia Recovery in AphasiaR01DC008355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
A Unified Neuroanatomical Model of Speech Production and Perception: ImplicationsR01DC009571 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS, RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
TARGETED TRANSCRANIAL ELECTROTHERAPY SYSTEM TO ACCELERATE STROKE RECOVERYR41NS076123 · NINDS · SOTERIX MEDICAL,INC. · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2011 to 2012
$542k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008355NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC011739NINDS NIH HHS R41 NS076123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances treatment outcomes post-stroke. Feasibility and tolerability of high-definition (HD) tDCS (a technique that increases current focality and intensity) for consecutive weekdays as an adjuvant to behavioral treatment in a clinical population has not been demonstrated.

objectiveTo determine HD-tDCS feasibility outcomes: 1) ability to implement study as designed, 2) acceptability of repeated HD-tDCS administration to patients, and 3) preliminary efficacy.

methodsEight patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia participated in a randomized crossover trial with two arms: conventional sponge-based (CS) tDCS and HD-tDCS. Computerized anomia treatment was administered for five consecutive days during each treatment arm.

resultsIndividualized modeling/targeting procedures and an 8-channel HD-tDCS device were developed. CS-tDCS and HD-tDCS were comparable in terms of implementation, acceptability, and outcomes. Naming accuracy and response time improved for both stimulation conditions. Change in accuracy of trained items was numerically higher (but not statistically significant) for HD-tDCS compared to CS-tDCS for most patients.

conclusionsRegarding feasibility, HD-tDCS treatment studies can be implemented when designed similarly to documented CS-tDCS studies. HD-tDCS is likely to be acceptable to patients and clinicians. Preliminary efficacy data suggest that HD-tDCS effects, using only 4 electrodes, are at least comparable to CS-tDCS.

Indexed as

AgedAphasiaCross-Over StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeAphasiafeasibilityhigh-definition tDCSstroketDCStreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID25547776
PMCPMC5764169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.