Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25547480›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Unique characteristics of informal hospice cancer caregiving.

Karla T Washington, Kenneth C Pike, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Engaging Interprofessional Students to Develop and Evaluate an Educational Booklet for Cancer Caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karla T WashingtonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, MA306 Medical Sciences Building, DC032.00, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA, washingtonkar@health.missouri.edu.
Kenneth C Pike
George Demiris
Debra Parker Oliver
University of Missouri · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

A Problem Solving Intervention for Hospice CaregiversR01NR012213 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEMIRIS, GEORGE · 2011 to 2021
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012213NINR NIH HHS R01NR012213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to describe the unique characteristics of informal hospice cancer caregiving.

methodsResearchers conducted a secondary analysis of data drawn from a randomized clinical trial of an informal hospice caregiving intervention (N = 348). Demographic characteristics and measures of the informal caregiving experience of hospice patients and their informal caregivers were compared based on the patient's diagnosis using chi-square tests for association of categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables.

resultsInformal caregivers of cancer patients differed from their non-cancer counterparts in a number of respects including patient age, caregiver age, patient residence, relationship between patient and caregiver, amount and duration of care provided, likelihood to incur out-of-pocket expenses related to patient care, caregiver problem-solving style, and impact on caregiver daily schedule. There were no statistically significant differences between cancer and non-cancer caregivers in terms of gender, race, employment status, anxiety, and quality of life.

conclusionsWhile cancer and non-cancer caregivers are similar in many respects, a number of unique features characterize the informal hospice cancer caregiving experience. Attention to these unique features will allow hospice providers to tailor supportive care interventions to better address cancer caregivers' needs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHealth ExpendituresHospice CareHospicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSocial SupportUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25547480
PMCPMC4449794
OpenAlexW2080592359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.