Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25547414›Full record

Trial reportMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2015

RTS,S vaccination is associated with serologic evidence of decreased exposure to Plasmodium falciparum liver- and blood-stage parasites.

Joe J Campo, John J Aponte, Jeff Skinner, Rie Nakajima, Douglas M Molina, Li Liang, Jahit Sacarlal, Pedro L Alonso, Peter D Crompton, Philip L Felgner and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genotypic analysis of RTS,S/AS01The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. KILchip v1.0: A NovelFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Joe J Campo‡ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; §Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique; jcampo@antigendiscovery.com.
John J Aponte‡ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; §Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique;
Jeff Skinner¶Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD;
Rie Nakajima‡‡Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA;
Douglas M Molina‖Antigen Discovery Inc., Irvine, CA;
Li Liang‡‡Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA;
Jahit Sacarlal§Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique; **Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Pedro L Alonso‡ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; §Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique;
Peter D Crompton¶Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD;
Philip L Felgner‡‡Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA; ‖Antigen Discovery Inc., Irvine, CA;
Carlota Dobaño‡ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; §Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique;
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversity of California, Irvine · USAntigen Discovery (United States) · USManhiça Health Research Centre · MZNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
Mechanisms of naturally-acquired immunity to malaria and clinical trials of anti-malaria monoclonal antibodiesZIAAI001155 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CROMPTON, PETER · 2011 to 2025
$30.9M
TransmissionU19AI089686 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BURKOT, TOM · 2010 to 2016
$9.9M
Protective biomarkers for the development of vaccines against malariaR44AI066791 · NIAID · IMMPORT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI FELGNER, PHILIP LOUIS · 2012 to 2014
$2.3M
Predicting naturally acquired humoral immunity against malariaR01AI095916 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FELGNER, PHILIP LOUIS · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095916NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI095916NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI066791NIAID NIH HHS R44-AI066791NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089686NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI089686NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The leading malaria vaccine candidate, RTS,S, targets the sporozoite and liver stages of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle, yet it provides partial protection against disease associated with the subsequent blood stage of infection. Antibodies against the vaccine target, the circumsporozoite protein, have not shown sufficient correlation with risk of clinical malaria to serve as a surrogate for protection. The mechanism by which a vaccine that targets the asymptomatic sporozoite and liver stages protects against disease caused by blood-stage parasites remains unclear. We hypothesized that vaccination with RTS,S protects from blood-stage disease by reducing the number of parasites emerging from the liver, leading to prolonged exposure to subclinical levels of blood-stage parasites that go undetected and untreated, which in turn boosts pre-existing antibody-mediated blood-stage immunity. To test this hypothesis, we compared antibody responses to 824 P. falciparum antigens by protein array in Mozambican children 6 months after receiving a full course of RTS,S (n = 291) versus comparator vaccine (n = 297) in a Phase IIb trial. Moreover, we used a nested case-control design to compare antibody responses of children who did or did not experience febrile malaria. Unexpectedly, we found that the breadth and magnitude of the antibody response to both liver and asexual blood-stage antigens was significantly lower in RTS,S vaccinees, with the exception of only four antigens, including the RTS,S circumsporozoite antigen. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, these findings suggest that RTS,S confers protection against clinical malaria by blocking sporozoite invasion of hepatocytes, thereby reducing exposure to the blood-stage parasites that cause disease. We also found that antibody profiles 6 months after vaccination did not distinguish protected and susceptible children during the subsequent 12-month follow-up period but were strongly associated with exposure. Together, these data provide insight into the mechanism by which RTS,S protects from malaria.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantLiverMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMozambiquePlasmodium falciparumProtein Array AnalysisSporozoitesAntigens, ProtozoanMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25547414
PMCPMC4349974
OpenAlexW2091143158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.