ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
FogBank: a single cell segmentation across multiple cell lines and image modalities.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- An improved watershed-based algorithm for ore image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- High-volume, label-free imaging for quantifying single-cell dynamics in induced pluripotent stem cell colonies.PloS one · 2024Article
- Unbiased image segmentation assessment toolkit for quantitative differentiation of state-of-the-art algorithms and pipelines.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Dual role of Apolipoprotein D as long-term instructive factor and acute signal conditioning microglial secretory and phagocytic responses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Study on segmentation of blasting fragment images from open-pit mine based on U-CARFnet.PloS one · 2023Article
- GEMA-An Automatic Segmentation Method for Real-Time Analysis of Mammalian Cell Growth in Microfluidic Devices.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- Autocrine signaling can explain the emergence of Allee effects in cancer cell populations.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- A multi-dimensional, time-lapse, high content screening platform applied to schistosomiasis drug discovery.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence based approaches to cell function prediction.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2020Article
- In Situ Single-Cell Western Blot on Adherent Cell Culture.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019Review
- Cell segmentation methods for label-free contrast microscopy: review and comprehensive comparison.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Learn to segment single cells with deep distance estimator and deep cell detector.Computers in biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Automated Cell Segmentation for Quantitative Phase Microscopy.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2018Article
- Increased susceptibility to fundus camera-delivered light-induced retinal degeneration in mice deficient in oxidative stress response proteins.Experimental eye research · 2017Article
- Article
- Generalizing cell segmentation and quantification.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Endothelial basement membrane laminin 511 is essential for shear stress response.The EMBO journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany cell lines currently used in medical research, such as cancer cells or stem cells, grow in confluent sheets or colonies. The biology of individual cells provide valuable information, thus the separation of touching cells in these microscopy images is critical for counting, identification and measurement of individual cells. Over-segmentation of single cells continues to be a major problem for methods based on morphological watershed due to the high level of noise in microscopy cell images. There is a need for a new segmentation method that is robust over a wide variety of biological images and can accurately separate individual cells even in challenging datasets such as confluent sheets or colonies.
resultsWe present a new automated segmentation method called FogBank that accurately separates cells when confluent and touching each other. This technique is successfully applied to phase contrast, bright field, fluorescence microscopy and binary images. The method is based on morphological watershed principles with two new features to improve accuracy and minimize over-segmentation. First, FogBank uses histogram binning to quantize pixel intensities which minimizes the image noise that causes over-segmentation. Second, FogBank uses a geodesic distance mask derived from raw images to detect the shapes of individual cells, in contrast to the more linear cell edges that other watershed-like algorithms produce. We evaluated the segmentation accuracy against manually segmented datasets using two metrics. FogBank achieved segmentation accuracy on the order of 0.75 (1 being a perfect match). We compared our method with other available segmentation techniques in term of achieved performance over the reference data sets. FogBank outperformed all related algorithms. The accuracy has also been visually verified on data sets with 14 cell lines across 3 imaging modalities leading to 876 segmentation evaluation images.
conclusionsFogBank produces single cell segmentation from confluent cell sheets with high accuracy. It can be applied to microscopy images of multiple cell lines and a variety of imaging modalities. The code for the segmentation method is available as open-source and includes a Graphical User Interface for user friendly execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.