Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25546272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2014

Agricultural and management practices and bacterial contamination in greenhouse versus open field lettuce production.

Kevin Holvoet, Imca Sampers, Marleen Seynnaeve, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Mieke Uyttendaele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavior of the Biological Control AgentFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Total Coliform and GenericHorticulturae · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Can FinTech Development Curb Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Path Loss Determination Using Linear and Cubic Regression Inside a Classic Tomato Greenhouse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  13. The prevalence ofGut pathogens · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Irrigation Water Quality for Leafy Crops: A Perspective of Risks and Potential Solutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin HolvoetLaboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent B-9000, Belgium. kevin.holvoet@ugent.be.
Imca SampersLaboratory of Food Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Industrial Biological Sciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Campus Kortrijk, Graaf Karel de Goedelaan 5, Kortrijk B-8500, Belgium. imca.sampers@ugent.be.
Marleen SeynnaeveINAGRO, Provincial Research and Advisory Center for Agriculture and Horticulture, Ieperseweg 87, Rumbeke-Beitem B-8800, Belgium. marleen.seynnaeve@inagro.be.
Liesbeth JacxsensLaboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent B-9000, Belgium. liesbeth.jacxsens@ugent.be.
Mieke UyttendaeleLaboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent B-9000, Belgium. mieke.uyttendaele@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gain insight into potential differences in risk factors for microbial contamination in greenhouse versus open field lettuce production. Information was collected on sources, testing, and monitoring and if applicable, treatment of irrigation and harvest rinsing water. These data were combined with results of analysis on the levels of Escherichia coli as a fecal indicator organism and the presence of enteric bacterial pathogens on both lettuce crops and environmental samples. Enterohemorragic Escherichia coli (EHEC) PCR signals (vt1 or vt2 positive and eae positive), Campylobacter spp., and Salmonella spp. isolates were more often obtained from irrigation water sampled from open field farms (21/45, 46.7%) versus from greenhouse production (9/75, 12.0%). The open field production was shown to be more prone to fecal contamination as the number of lettuce samples and irrigation water with elevated E. coli was significantly higher. Farmers comply with generic guidelines on good agricultural practices available at the national level, but monitoring of microbial quality, and if applicable appropriateness of water treatment, or water used for irrigation or at harvest is restricted. These results indicate the need for further elaboration of specific guidelines and control measures for leafy greens with regard to microbial hazards.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAgricultural IrrigationAgricultureBacteriaBelgiumCrops, AgriculturalFood MicrobiologyLactucaPlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID25546272
PMCPMC4306849
OpenAlexW2060557918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.