Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25545855›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2015

Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.

Jennifer L Reed, Jill S Huppert, Gordon L Gillespie, Regina G Taylor, Carolyn K Holland, Evaline A Alessandrini, Jessica A Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Research Agenda for Emergency Medicine-based Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Confidentiality Matters but How Do We Improve Implementation in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Care?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Review
  8. Preparing for the Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Self-Test.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Partner Notification for Youth Living With HIV in 14 Cities in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Syphilis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer L ReedDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Jill S Huppert
Gordon L Gillespie
Regina G Taylor
Carolyn K Holland
Evaline A Alessandrini
Jessica A Kahn

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences and TrainingUL1TR000077 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E. · 2012 to 2014
$9.9M
Ohio Interdisciplinary Women's Health Career TrainingK12HD051953 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000077NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD051953NICHD NIH HHS K12HD051953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImportant barriers to addressing the sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic among adolescents are the inadequate partner notification of positive STI results and insufficient rates of partner testing and treatment. However, adolescent attitudes regarding partner notification and treatment are not well understood. The aim was to qualitatively explore the barriers to and preferences for partner notification and treatment among adolescent males and females tested for STIs in an emergency department (ED) setting and to explore the acceptability of ED personnel notifying their sexual partners.

methodsThis was a descriptive, qualitative study in which a convenience sample of 40 adolescents (18 females, 22 males) 14 to 21 years of age who presented to either adult or pediatric EDs with STI-related complaints participated. Individualized, semistructured, confidential interviews were administered to each participant. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim by an independent transcriptionist. Data were analyzed using framework analysis.

resultsBarriers to partner notification included fear of retaliation or loss of the relationship, lack of understanding of or concern for the consequences associated with an STI, and social stigma and embarrassment. Participants reported two primary barriers to their partners obtaining STI testing and treatment: lack of transportation to the health care site and the partner's fear of STI positive test results. Most participants preferred to notify their main sexual partners of an STI exposure via a face-to-face interaction or a phone call. Most participants were agreeable with a health care provider (HCP) notifying their main sexual partners of STI exposure and preferred that the HCP notify the partner by phone call.

conclusionsThere are several adolescent preferences and barriers for partner notification and treatment. To be most effective, future interventions to prevent adolescent STIs should incorporate these preferences and address the barriers to partner notification. In an ED setting, using HCPs to provide partner notification of STI exposures is acceptable to adolescent patients; however, the feasibility of this type of program needs further exploration.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceSexual PartnersAdolescentContact TracingEmergency Service, HospitalFearFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleSexually Transmitted DiseasesSocial StigmaTelephoneTransportationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25545855
PMCPMC4318513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.