Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25545725›Full record

ReviewJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2015

Delay discounting and the use of mindful attention versus distraction in the treatment of drug addiction: a conceptual review.

Melinda L Ashe, Michelle G Newman, Stephen J Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Momentary mindfulness versus distraction coping messages to reduce cannabis craving among young adults: A microrandomized trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melinda L AsheThe Pennsylvania State University.
Michelle G Newman
Stephen J Wilson

Funding

Career Development Program in Women's Health Research at Penn StateK12HD055882 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WEISMAN, CAROL S · 2007 to 2016
$4.7M
(PQA1) FMRI Neurofeedback and Descision-Making in Habitual Cigarette SmokersR21CA190093 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WILSON, STEPHEN JEFFREY · 2014 to 2015
$361k
Nicotine dependence, reward sensitivity, and lapse behavior in light smokersR03DA035929 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WILSON, STEPHEN JEFFREY · 2014 to 2015
$148k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA190093NCI NIH HHS R21CA190093NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055882NICHD NIH HHS K12HD055882NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA035929NIDA NIH HHS R03DA035929NIDA NIH HHS R21DA037149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, researchers have integrated measurements of delay discounting, how the subjective valuation of a reward changes as a function of time, into their study of addiction. Research has begun to explore the idea that delay discounting may serve as both a marker for the effectiveness of existing treatments for addiction and a potential target for novel intervention strategies. As this work is in its infancy, many potentially significant connections between the construct of delay discounting and the treatment of addiction have yet to be explored. Here, we present a conceptual review highlighting novel points of intersection between delay discounting and two approaches to treating addiction that have become increasingly popular in recent years: those that focus on the development of mindfulness skills and those that emphasize the use of distraction techniques. Viewing these two techniques through the lens of delay discounting is particularly intriguing because of the very different way that they address the experience of drug cravings in the present moment (nonjudgmentally attending to vs. shifting attention away from subjective cravings, respectively). We propose that these opposing strategies for dealing with cravings may interact with delay discounting in ways that have important implications for treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingAttentionCravingHumansMindfulnessSubstance-Related Disorderscravingdelay discountingdistractiondrug addictionmindfulness

Identifiers

PMID25545725
PMCPMC4410050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.