Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25545153›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2015

G-CSF priming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine (GCLAC) for upfront treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, advanced myelodysplastic syndrome or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Pamela S Becker, Bruno C Medeiros, Anthony S Stein, Megan Othus, Frederick R Appelbaum, Stephen J Forman, Bart L Scott, Paul C Hendrie, Kelda M Gardner, John M Pagel and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela S BeckerDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Bruno C Medeiros
Anthony S Stein
Megan Othus
Frederick R Appelbaum
Stephen J Forman
Bart L Scott
Paul C Hendrie
Kelda M Gardner
John M Pagel
Roland B Walter
Cynthia Parks
Brent L Wood
Janis L Abkowitz
Elihu H Estey
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USCity of Hope · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior study of the combination of clofarabine and high dose cytarabine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming (GCLAC) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia resulted in a 46% rate of complete remission despite unfavorable risk cytogenetics. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the remission rate and survival with GCLAC were superior to FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF) in the relapsed setting. We therefore initiated a study of the GCLAC regimen in the upfront setting in a multicenter trial. The objectives were to evaluate the rates of complete remission (CR), overall and relapse-free survival (OS and RFS), and toxicity of GCLAC. Clofarabine was administered at 30 mg m(-2) day(-1) × 5 and cytarabine at 2 g m(-2) day(-1) × 5 after G-CSF priming in 50 newly-diagnosed patients ages 18-64 with AML or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Responses were assessed in the different cytogenetic risk groups and in patients with antecedent hematologic disorder. The overall CR rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64-88%) and the CR + CRp (CR with incomplete platelet count recovery) was 82% (95% CI 71-93%). The CR rate was 100% for patients with favorable, 84% for those with intermediate, and 62% for those with unfavorable risk cytogenetics. For patients with an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD), the CR rate was 65%, compared to 85% for those without an AHD. The 60 day mortality was 2%. Thus, front line GCLAC is a well-tolerated, effective induction regimen for AML and advanced myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative disorders.

Indexed as

Adenine NucleotidesAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArabinonucleosidesClofarabineCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFlow CytometryGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesAdenine NucleotidesArabinonucleosidesClofarabineCytarabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID25545153
PMCPMC4718553
OpenAlexW2159683347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.