Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25544702›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2015

Current surveys on the prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria spp. and Acanthocheilonema reconditum infections in dogs in Romania.

Angela Monica Ionică, Ioana Adriana Matei, Viorica Mircean, Mirabela Oana Dumitrache, Gianluca D'Amico, Adriana Győrke, Nikola Pantchev, Giada Annoscia, Kateřina Albrechtová, Domenico Otranto and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epidemiological and Molecular Investigation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Circulation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pets, Wildlife and Parasites.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Microfilariae infection byJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. First Report ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The European Badger as a New Host forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela Monica IonicăDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăştur 3-5, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, ionica.angela@usamvcluj.ro.
Ioana Adriana Matei
Viorica Mircean
Mirabela Oana Dumitrache
Gianluca D'Amico
Adriana Győrke
Nikola Pantchev
Giada Annoscia
Kateřina Albrechtová
Domenico Otranto
David Modrý
Andrei Daniel Mihalca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decades, Dirofilaria spp. infection in European dogs has rapidly spread from historically endemic areas towards eastern and northeastern countries, but little or no information is available from these geographical regions. The present study provides a picture of filarial infections in dogs from Romania and compares two tests for the diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis. From July 2010 to March 2011, blood samples were collected from 390 dogs from nine counties of Romania and serological SNAP tests were performed for the detection of D. immitis antigen. The remaining blood clots were subsequently used for DNA extraction followed by multiplex PCR for assessing filarioid species diversity (i.e. D. immitis, Dirofilaria repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum). Based on molecular detection, an overall prevalence of 6.92 % (n = 27; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.70-10.03 %) for D. repens, 6.15 % (n = 24; 95 % CI 4.07-9.14 %) for D. immitis and 2.05 % (n = 8; 95 % CI 0.96-4.16 %) for A. reconditum was recorded, with significant variations according to sampling areas. Coinfections of D. immitis and D. repens were recorded in 23.91 % (n = 11) positive dogs. A slightly higher prevalence for D. immitis was detected at the SNAP test (n = 28, 7.17 %; 95 % CI 4.91-10.33 %), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.66). However, only 53.57 % (n = 15) of antigen-positive dogs were confirmed by PCR, while other dogs (n = 9) PCR positive for D. immitis were negative at the serology. The present study shows that Dirofilaria species are endemic in the southern and southeastern areas of Romania, This article also provides, for the first time, an epidemiological picture of the distribution of A. reconditum in Romania.

Indexed as

AcanthocheilonemaAnimalsCoinfectionDirofilariaDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRomania

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.