Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25544551›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2014

Prediction-driven matched molecular pairs to interpret QSARs and aid the molecular optimization process.

Yurii Sushko, Sergii Novotarskyi, Robert Körner, Joachim Vogt, Ahmed Abdelaziz, Igor V Tetko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Interpretable Deep-Learning pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Many InChIs and quite some feat.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yurii SushkoeADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany.
Sergii NovotarskyieADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany.
Robert KörnereADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany.
Joachim VogteADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany.
Ahmed AbdelazizeADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany.
Igor V TetkoeADMET GmbH, Lichtenbergstraße 8, D-85748 Garching, Munich Germany ; Helmholtz-Zentrum München - German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Structural Biology, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany ; A.M. Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya St. 18, 420008 Kazan, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQSAR is an established and powerful method for cheap in silico assessment of physicochemical properties and biological activities of chemical compounds. However, QSAR models are rather complex mathematical constructs that cannot easily be interpreted. Medicinal chemists would benefit from practical guidance regarding which molecules to synthesize. Another possible approach is analysis of pairs of very similar molecules, so-called matched molecular pairs (MMPs). Such an approach allows identification of molecular transformations that affect particular activities (e.g. toxicity). In contrast to QSAR, chemical interpretation of these transformations is straightforward. Furthermore, such transformations can give medicinal chemists useful hints for the hit-to-lead optimization process.

resultsThe current study suggests a combination of QSAR and MMP approaches by finding MMP transformations based on QSAR predictions for large chemical datasets. The study shows that such an approach, referred to as prediction-driven MMP analysis, is a useful tool for medicinal chemists, allowing identification of large numbers of "interesting" transformations that can be used to drive the molecular optimization process. All the methodological developments have been implemented as software products available online as part of OCHEM (http://ochem.eu/).

conclusionsThe prediction-driven MMPs methodology was exemplified by two use cases: modelling of aquatic toxicity and CYP3A4 inhibition. This approach helped us to interpret QSAR models and allowed identification of a number of "significant" molecular transformations that affect the desired properties. This can facilitate drug design as a part of molecular optimization process. Graphical AbstractMolecular matched pairs and transformation graphs facilitate interpretable molecular optimisation process.

Indexed as

InterpretationInverse QSARMatched molecular pairsMedicinal chemistryMMPMolecule optimizationOCHEMOnline chemical modelling environmentQSAR

Identifiers

PMID25544551
PMCPMC4272757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.