ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2014
Prediction-driven matched molecular pairs to interpret QSARs and aid the molecular optimization process.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChemBang: Expanding the Chemical Space Around Small Molecules.Molecular informatics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Toxicity Prediction Using Chemical Structures: Pillars for Success in the Real World.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Review
- Interpretable Deep-Learning pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Navigating the Chemical Space of ENR Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Design of new imidazole derivatives with anti-HCMV activity: QSAR modeling, synthesis and biological testing.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- Semi-automated workflow for molecular pair analysis and QSAR-assisted transformation space expansion.Journal of cheminformatics · 2021Article
- Applications of Deep-Learning in Exploiting Large-Scale and Heterogeneous Compound Data in Industrial Pharmaceutical Research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Matched Molecular Pair Analysis on Large Melting Point Datasets: A Big Data Perspective.ChemMedChem · 2018Article
- Many InChIs and quite some feat.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2015Article
- Emerging concepts promising new horizons for marine biodiscovery and synthetic biology.Marine drugs · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQSAR is an established and powerful method for cheap in silico assessment of physicochemical properties and biological activities of chemical compounds. However, QSAR models are rather complex mathematical constructs that cannot easily be interpreted. Medicinal chemists would benefit from practical guidance regarding which molecules to synthesize. Another possible approach is analysis of pairs of very similar molecules, so-called matched molecular pairs (MMPs). Such an approach allows identification of molecular transformations that affect particular activities (e.g. toxicity). In contrast to QSAR, chemical interpretation of these transformations is straightforward. Furthermore, such transformations can give medicinal chemists useful hints for the hit-to-lead optimization process.
resultsThe current study suggests a combination of QSAR and MMP approaches by finding MMP transformations based on QSAR predictions for large chemical datasets. The study shows that such an approach, referred to as prediction-driven MMP analysis, is a useful tool for medicinal chemists, allowing identification of large numbers of "interesting" transformations that can be used to drive the molecular optimization process. All the methodological developments have been implemented as software products available online as part of OCHEM (http://ochem.eu/).
conclusionsThe prediction-driven MMPs methodology was exemplified by two use cases: modelling of aquatic toxicity and CYP3A4 inhibition. This approach helped us to interpret QSAR models and allowed identification of a number of "significant" molecular transformations that affect the desired properties. This can facilitate drug design as a part of molecular optimization process. Graphical AbstractMolecular matched pairs and transformation graphs facilitate interpretable molecular optimisation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.