Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25544503›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2015

The immunological underpinnings of vaccinations to prevent cytomegalovirus disease.

A Louise McCormick, Edward S Mocarski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Overview of Human Cytomegalovirus Pathogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  3. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A Native Human Monoclonal Antibody Targeting HCMV gB (AD-2 Site I).International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Brain-resident memory CD8European journal of immunology · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CMV immunology.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Louise McCormickLaboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Edward S MocarskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DNA REPLICATION AND RECOMBINATIONR01AI020211 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD S MOCARSKI, EDWARD S. · 1985 to 2021
$5.9M
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS PATHOGENESIS IN IMMUNODEFICIENCYR01AI030363 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD S MOCARSKI, EDWARD S. · 1991 to 2011
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI020211NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI020211NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI030363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A universal cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccination promises to reduce the burden of the developmental damage that afflicts up to 0.5% of live births worldwide. An effective vaccination that prevents transplacental transmission would reduce CMV congenital disease and CMV-associated still births and leave populations less susceptible to opportunistic CMV disease. Thus, a vaccination against this virus has long been recognized for the potential of enormous health-care savings because congenital damage is life-long and existing anti-viral options are limited. Vaccine researchers, industry leaders, and regulatory representatives have discussed the challenges posed by clinical efficacy trials that would lead to a universal CMV vaccine, reviewing the links between infection and disease, and identifying settings where disrupting viral transmission might provide a surrogate endpoint for disease prevention. Reducing the complexity of such trials would facilitate vaccine development. Children and adolescents are the targets for universal vaccination, with the expectation of protecting the offspring of immunized women. Given that a majority of females worldwide experience CMV infection during childhood, a universal vaccine must boost natural immunity and reduce transmission due to reactivation and re-infection as well as primary infection during pregnancy. Although current vaccine strategies recognize the value of humoral and cellular immunity, the precise mechanisms that act at the placental interface remain elusive. Immunity resulting from natural infection appears to limit rather than prevent reactivation of latent viruses and susceptibility to re-infection, leaving a challenge for universal vaccination to improve upon natural immunity levels. Despite these hurdles, early phase clinical trials have achieved primary end points in CMV seronegative subjects. Efficacy studies must be expanded to mixed populations of CMV-naive and naturally infected subjects to understand the overall efficacy and potential. Together with CMV vaccine candidates currently in clinical development, additional promising preclinical strategies continue to come forward; however, these face limitations due to the insufficient understanding of host defense mechanisms that prevent transmission, as well as the age-old challenges of reaching the appropriate threshold of immunogenicity, efficacy, durability and potency. This review focuses on the current understanding of natural and CMV vaccine-induced protective immunity.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsCytomegalovirus VaccinesHumansVaccinationCytomegalovirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25544503
PMCPMC4654290
OpenAlexW2084811949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.