Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25544043›Full record

ArticleChemistry & biology2015

Topological models of heteromeric protein assemblies from mass spectrometry: application to the yeast eIF3:eIF5 complex.

Argyris Politis, Carla Schmidt, Elina Tjioe, Alan M Sandercock, Keren Lasker, Yuliya Gordiyenko, Daniel Russel, Andrej Sali, Carol V Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry & biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integrative modelling of cellular assemblies.Current opinion in structural biology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Protein Structural Analysis via Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Argyris PolitisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK; Department of Chemistry, King's College London, 7 Trinity Street, London SE1 1DB, UK.
Carla SchmidtDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK.
Elina TjioeDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Alan M SandercockDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Keren LaskerDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Yuliya GordiyenkoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK.
Daniel RusselDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Andrej SaliDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: sali@salilab.org.
Carol V RobinsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, UK. Electronic address: carol.robinson@chem.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBQB3 · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

IMP: Software for Hybrid Determination of Macromolecular Assembly StructuresR01GM083960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2008 to 2024
$5.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I02626X/1Medical Research Council G1000819NIGMS NIH HHS GM083960NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083960Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 008150/B/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Describing, understanding, and modulating the function of the cell require elucidation of the structures of macromolecular assemblies. Here, we describe an integrative method for modeling heteromeric complexes using as a starting point disassembly pathways determined by native mass spectrometry (MS). In this method, the pathway data and other available information are encoded as a scoring function on the positions of the subunits of the complex. The method was assessed on its ability to reproduce the native contacts in five benchmark cases with simulated MS data and two cases with real MS data. To illustrate the power of our method, we purified the yeast initiation factor 3 (eIF3) complex and characterized it by native MS and chemical crosslinking MS. We established substoichiometric binding of eIF5 and derived a model for the five-subunit eIF3 complex, at domain level, consistent with its role as a scaffold for other initiation factors.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularTandem Mass SpectrometryEukaryotic Initiation Factor-3Peptide Initiation FactorsProtein BindingROC CurveSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-3Peptide Initiation FactorsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25544043
PMCPMC4306531
OpenAlexW2007477408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.