Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25543296›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2015

Longitudinal effect of curcumin-photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy in adolescents during fixed orthodontic treatment: a single-blind randomized clinical trial study.

Marco Aurélio Paschoal, Cíntia Maria Zanin Moura, Fabiano Jeremias, Juliana Feltrin Souza, Vanderlei S Bagnato, Juçaíra S M Giusti, Lourdes Santos-Pinto

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco Aurélio PaschoalMaster Program in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luís, MA, 65075-120, Brazil. marcobpaschoal@hotmail.com.
Cíntia Maria Zanin MouraAraraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Araraquara, SP, 14801-903, Brazil. cizanin@hotmail.com.
Fabiano JeremiasDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP, 14801-903, Brazil. fabianojeremias1@yahoo.com.br.
Juliana Feltrin SouzaMaster's Program in Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Positivo University - UP, Curitiba, PR, 81280-330, Brazil. julianafeltrin@hotmail.com.
Vanderlei S BagnatoSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. vander@ifsc.usp.br.
Juçaíra S M GiustiSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lourdes Santos-PintoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP, 14801-903, Brazil. lspinto@foar.unesp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White spot lesions are one of the concerns during the fixed orthodontic treatment. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial/anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin-photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (c-PACT) and chlorhexidine varnish on the plaque accumulation and gingival bleeding in adolescents under fixed orthodontic treatment. A randomized clinical trial was performed with an initial number of 45 patients being distributed into three groups: group I-chlorhexidine varnish 2%, group II-placebo varnish, and group III-c-PACT (curcumin at 1.5 mg.mL(-1)) exposed to blue Light-emitting diode (LED) light at 450 nm (power density = 165 mW.cm(-2), fluency = 96 J.cm(-2), total dose = 150.7 J). The treatments were performed for four consecutive times with an interval of 1 week each. After the interventions, two calibrated examiners (Kappa value = 0.75) analyzed the dental plaque accumulation by plaque index (PI) and gingivitis condition by gingival bleeding index (GBI) with 1 and 3 months of follow-up after the treatments comprised a final sample of 35 patients. No significant difference was found to PI between the groups during baseline and 1-month period. Group III (1.52 ± 0.51) presented significance difference from group I (0.91 ± 0.75) and group II (1.03 ± 0.51) at 3 months of follow-up. In this same period, there was more plaque accumulation with significant statistical difference (P ≤ 0.05) in comparison to the other periods to all studied groups. There was a GBI reduction statistically significant to groups I and III at 1-month follow-up in comparison to other periods. No effect was verified to dental plaque accumulation after the photodynamic application mediated with curcumin activated with a blue LED light.

Indexed as

OrthodonticsPhotochemotherapyAdolescentAnti-Infective AgentsChlorhexidineCurcuminDental PlaqueDental Plaque IndexGingival HemorrhageHumansLongitudinal StudiesSingle-Blind MethodAnti-Infective AgentsChlorhexidineCurcuminCurcuminOrthodontic appliancesPhotochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25543296
OpenAlexW1995159426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.