Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25543117›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

Selection on meiosis genes in diploid and tetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa.

Kevin M Wright, Brian Arnold, Katherine Xue, Maria Šurinová, Jeremy O'Connell, Kirsten Bomblies

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chromosomal collinearity drives meiotic instability in Brassica autoallopolyploid.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improved synapsis dynamics accompany meiotic stability inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Meiosis in allopolyploid Arabidopsis suecica.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin M WrightDepartment of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology, Harvard University.
Brian ArnoldDepartment of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology, Harvard University.
Katherine XueDepartment of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology, Harvard University.
Maria ŠurinováInstitute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Pruhonice, Czech Republic.
Jeremy O'ConnellDepartment of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology, Harvard University.
Kirsten BombliesDepartment of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology, Harvard University kbomblies@oeb.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

Evolution of Meiotic Mechanisms in Divergent Cytological EnvironmentsF32GM105293 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, KEVIN · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM105293NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic chromosome segregation is critical for fertility across eukaryotes, and core meiotic processes are well conserved even between kingdoms. Nevertheless, recent work in animals has shown that at least some meiosis genes are highly diverse or strongly differentiated among populations. What drives this remains largely unknown. We previously showed that autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa evolved stable meiosis, likely through reduced crossover rates, and that associated with this there is strong evidence for selection in a subset of meiosis genes known to affect axis formation, synapsis, and crossover frequency. Here, we use genome-wide data to study the molecular evolution of 70 meiosis genes in a much wider sample of A. arenosa. We sample the polyploid lineage, a diploid lineage from the Carpathian Mountains, and a more distantly related diploid lineage from the adjacent, but biogeographically distinct Pannonian Basin. We find that not only did selection act on meiosis genes in the polyploid lineage but also independently on a smaller subset of meiosis genes in Pannonian diploids. Functionally related genes are targeted by selection in these distinct contexts, and in two cases, independent sweeps occurred in the same loci. The tetraploid lineage has sustained selection on more genes, has more amino acid changes in each, and these more often affect conserved or potentially functional sites. We hypothesize that Pannonian diploid and tetraploid A. arenosa experienced selection on structural proteins that mediate sister chromatid cohesion, the formation of meiotic chromosome axes, and synapsis, likely for different underlying reasons.

Indexed as

DiploidyEvolution, MolecularGenes, PlantTetraploidyArabidopsisChromosome SegregationMeiosisevolutionmeiosispolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID25543117
PMCPMC4379401
OpenAlexW1970002577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.