Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25543022›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2015

Modulation of corticospinal excitability by reward depends on task framing.

Eric Mooshagian, Aysha Keisler, Trelawny Zimmermann, Janell M Schweickert, Eric M Wassermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric MooshagianBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 CENTER DR, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA; Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Aysha KeislerBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 CENTER DR, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA; Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Trelawny ZimmermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 CENTER DR, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA; Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Janell M SchweickertThe Wake Kendall Group, PLLC, 5247 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Suite 4, Washington, DC 20015, USA.
Eric M WassermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 CENTER DR, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA. Electronic address: wassermanne@ninds.nih.gov.

Funding

Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Findings from previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments suggest that the primary motor cortex (M1) is sensitive to reward conditions in the environment. However, the nature of this influence on M1 activity is poorly understood. The dopamine neuron response to conditioned stimuli encodes reward probability and outcome uncertainty, or the extent to which the outcome of a situation is known. Reward uncertainty and probability are related: uncertainty is maximal when probability is 0.5 and minimal when probability is 0 or 1 (i.e., certain outcome). Previous TMS-reward studies did not examine these factors independently. Here, we used single-pulse TMS to measure corticospinal excitability in 40 individuals while they performed a simple computer task, making guesses to find or avoid a hidden target. The task stimuli implied three levels of reward probability and two levels of uncertainty. We found that reward probability level interacted with the trial search condition. That is, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, a measure of corticospinal neuron excitability, increased with increasing reward probability when participants were instructed to "find" a target, but not when they were instructed to "avoid" a target. There was no effect of uncertainty on MEPs. Response times varied with the number of choices. A subset of participants also received paired-pulse stimulation to evaluate changes in short-intracortical inhibition (SICI). No effects of SICI were observed. Taken together, the results suggest that the reward-contingent modulation of M1 activity reflects reward probability or a related aspect of utility, not outcome uncertainty, and that this effect is sensitive to the conceptual framing of the task.

Indexed as

ProbabilityRewardUncertaintyAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexPyramidal TractsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultCorticospinal excitabilityExpectationReward probabilityTranscranial magnetic stimulationUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID25543022
PMCPMC4332695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.