Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25542687›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2014

Neural effects of cannabinoid CB1 neutral antagonist tetrahydrocannabivarin on food reward and aversion in healthy volunteers.

Luke Tudge, Clare Williams, Philip J Cowen, Ciara McCabe

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tetrahydrocannabivarin is Not Tetrahydrocannabinol.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biomedicines · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke TudgeSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (Mr Tudge and Dr McCabe); Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Ms Williams and Prof Cowen).
Clare WilliamsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (Mr Tudge and Dr McCabe); Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Ms Williams and Prof Cowen).
Philip J CowenSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (Mr Tudge and Dr McCabe); Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Ms Williams and Prof Cowen).
Ciara McCabeSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (Mr Tudge and Dr McCabe); Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Ms Williams and Prof Cowen). c.mccabe@reading.ac.uk.
University of Reading · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisturbances in the regulation of reward and aversion in the brain may underlie disorders such as obesity and eating disorders. We previously showed that the cannabis receptor subtype (CB1) inverse agonist rimonabant, an antiobesity drug withdrawn due to depressogenic side effects, diminished neural reward responses yet increased aversive responses (Horder et al., 2010). Unlike rimonabant, tetrahydrocannabivarin is a neutral CB1 receptor antagonist (Pertwee, 2005) and may therefore produce different modulations of the neural reward system. We hypothesized that tetrahydrocannabivarin would, unlike rimonabant, leave intact neural reward responses but augment aversive responses.

methodsWe used a within-subject, double-blind design. Twenty healthy volunteers received a single dose of tetrahydrocannabivarin (10mg) and placebo in randomized order on 2 separate occasions. We measured the neural response to rewarding (sight and/or flavor of chocolate) and aversive stimuli (picture of moldy strawberries and/or a less pleasant strawberry taste) using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Volunteers rated pleasantness, intensity, and wanting for each stimulus.

resultsThere were no significant differences between groups in subjective ratings. However, tetrahydrocannabivarin increased responses to chocolate stimuli in the midbrain, anterior cingulate cortex, caudate, and putamen. Tetrahydrocannabivarin also increased responses to aversive stimuli in the amygdala, insula, mid orbitofrontal cortex, caudate, and putamen.

conclusionsOur findings are the first to show that treatment with the CB1 neutral antagonist tetrahydrocannabivarin increases neural responding to rewarding and aversive stimuli. This effect profile suggests therapeutic activity in obesity, perhaps with a lowered risk of depressive side effects.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAffectAnti-Obesity AgentsAvoidance LearningBrainBrain MappingCacaoCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolFeeding BehaviorFemaleFragariaFruitAnti-Obesity AgentsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCNR1 protein, humanDronabinolReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1tetrahydrocannabivarin 9cannabinoidfMRIobesityrewardTHCv

Identifiers

PMID25542687
PMCPMC4438540
OpenAlexW2152316595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.