Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25542620›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

Crohn's disease management after intestinal resection: a randomised trial.

Peter De Cruz, Michael A Kamm, Amy L Hamilton, Kathryn J Ritchie, Efrosinia O Krejany, Alexandra Gorelik, Danny Liew, Lani Prideaux, Ian C Lawrance, Jane M Andrews and 18 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 224 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
39.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00989560 phase3completednot on this map

Post-Operative Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Recurrence "POCER" Study: Endoscopic Guided Therapeutic Intervention & Determination of Cause

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MelbourneRan2009 to 2013Enrolled175ConditionsCrohn's DiseaseArmsendoscopy
NCT06241170 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Mesentery Guided Bowel Resection Margin Versus Traditional Margin in Reducing Early Endoscopic Recurrence Rate After Ileocolic Resection in Patients With Crohn 's Disease:a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled172ConditionsEndoscopic Recurrence Rate, After Ileocolic Crohn 's Disease SurgeryArmsmesentery-guided resection margin, traditional resection margin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 596 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Biomarkers and Imaging for Evaluating Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Adalimumab for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Efficacy of Endoscopic Dilation of Gastroduodenal Crohn's Disease Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Guideline
  20. Pooled it

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter De CruzDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Austin Academic Centre, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Michael A KammDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: mkamm@unimelb.edu.au.
Amy L HamiltonDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kathryn J RitchieDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Efrosinia O KrejanyDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexandra GorelikMelbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Danny LiewMelbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lani PrideauxDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ian C LawranceCentre for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Fremantle Hospital and The University of Western Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia.
Jane M AndrewsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter A BamptonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter R GibsonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Miles SparrowDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rupert W LeongGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord and Bankstown Hospitals and The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Timothy H FlorinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Mater Health Services, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Richard B GearryDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Graham Radford-SmithQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Finlay A MacraeDepartment of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, and Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Henry DebinskiMelbourne Gastrointestinal Investigation Unit, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Warwick SelbyAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ian KronborgDepartment of Gastroenterology, Western Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael J JohnstonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rodney WoodsDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
P Ross ElliottDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sally J BellDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Steven J BrownDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
William R ConnellDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul V DesmondDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUSt Vincent's Hospital · AUAlfred Health · AUBankstown Lidcombe Hospital · AUCabrini Hospital · AUFlinders University · AUImperial College London · GBMater Health Services · AUMelbourne Health · AUMonash University · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Western Australia · AUWestern Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with Crohn's disease need an intestinal resection, but a majority will subsequently experience disease recurrence and require further surgery. This study aimed to identify the optimal strategy to prevent postoperative disease recurrence.

methodsIn this randomised trial, consecutive patients from 17 centres in Australia and New Zealand undergoing intestinal resection of all macroscopic Crohn's disease, with an endoscopically accessible anastomosis, received 3 months of metronidazole therapy. Patients at high risk of recurrence also received a thiopurine, or adalimumab if they were intolerant to thiopurines. Patients were randomly assigned to parallel groups: colonoscopy at 6 months (active care) or no colonoscopy (standard care). We used computer-generated block randomisation to allocate patients in each centre to active or standard care in a 2:1 ratio. For endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2) at 6 months, patients stepped-up to thiopurine, fortnightly adalimumab with thiopurine, or weekly adalimumab. The primary endpoint was endoscopic recurrence at 18 months. Patients and treating physicians were aware of the patient's study group and treatment, but central reading of the endoscopic findings was undertaken blind to the study group and treatment. Analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00989560.

findingsBetween Oct 13, 2009, and Sept 28, 2011, 174 (83% high risk across both active and standard care groups) patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug. Of 122 patients in the active care group, 47 (39%) stepped-up treatment. At 18 months, endoscopic recurrence occurred in 60 (49%) patients in the active care group and 35 (67%) patients in the standard care group (p=0.03). Complete mucosal normality was maintained in 27 (22%) of 122 patients in the active care group versus four (8%) in the standard care group (p=0.03). In the active care arm, of those with 6 months recurrence who stepped up treatment, 18 (38%) of 47 patients were in remission 12 months later; conversely, of those in remission at 6 months who did not change therapy recurrence occurred in 31 (41%) of 75 patients 12 months later. Smoking (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, p=0.02) and the presence of two or more clinical risk factors including smoking (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.01-7.7, p=0.05) increased the risk of endoscopic recurrence. The incidence and type of adverse and severe adverse events did not differ significantly between patients in the active care and standard care groups (100 [82%] of 122 vs 45 [87%] of 52; p=0.51) and (33 [27%] of 122 vs 18 [35%] of 52; p=0.36), respectively.

interpretationTreatment according to clinical risk of recurrence, with early colonoscopy and treatment step-up for recurrence, is better than conventional drug therapy alone for prevention of postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence. Selective immune suppression, adjusted for early recurrence, rather than routine use, leads to disease control in most patients. Clinical risk factors predict recurrence, but patients at low risk also need monitoring. Early remission does not preclude the need for ongoing monitoring.

fundingAbbVie, Gutsy Group, Gandel Philanthropy, Angior Foundation, Crohn's Colitis Australia, and the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineColonoscopyCrohn DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMercaptopurineMetronidazoleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineMercaptopurineMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID25542620
OpenAlexW2161685971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.