Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25542520›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2015

Growth of geographic atrophy in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

Juan E Grunwald, Maxwell Pistilli, Gui-Shuang Ying, Maureen G Maguire, Ebenezer Daniel, Daniel F Martin, Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Research Group

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00593450 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials: Lucentis-Avastin Trial (CATT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2008 to 2015Enrolled1,208ConditionsAge Related Macular DegenerationArmsranibizumab, bevacizumab
NCT04655482 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Treat-and-extend Using Aflibercept for Type 3 Neovascularization

TypeinterventionalSponsorKim's Eye HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsRetinal Angiomatous ProliferationArmsAflibercept Injection
NCT05062486 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

An Open-Label, Randomized, Double Arm, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of C and RQC for Preventing Progression in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorPaul A Knepper, MD PhDRan2021 to 2024Enrolled55ConditionsAge-related Macular DegenerationArmsResveratrol, Quercetin, Curcumin (RQC), Curcumin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhanced retinal pigment epithelial cells as a delivery vehicle for retinal disease.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan E GrunwaldDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: juangrun@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Maxwell PistilliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gui-Shuang YingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Maureen G MaguireDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ebenezer DanielDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel F MartinCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Research Group

Funding

Coordinating Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatments TrialsU10EY017823 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAGUIRE, MAUREEN G · 2006 to 2012
$19.2M
Photograph Reading Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017826 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRUNWALD, JUAN E · 2006 to 2013
$2.8M
Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials-OCT Reading CenterU10EY017825 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFE, GLENN · 2006 to 2013
$2.3M
Chair Grant for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017828 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, DANIEL F · 2006 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017823NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017825NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017826NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the growth of geographic atrophy (GA) during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

designCohort within a clinical trial.

participantsPatients included in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT).

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab and to a 2-year dosing regimen of monthly or pro re nata (PRN) or to monthly for 1 year and PRN the following year. Digital color photographs and fluorescein angiograms at baseline and 1 and 2 years were evaluated for GA, and the total area of GA was measured by 2 graders masked to treatment; differences were adjudicated. Multivariate linear mixed models of the annual change in the square root of the area included baseline demographic, treatment, and ocular characteristics on imaging as candidate risk factors.

main outcome measuresGeographic atrophy growth rate.

resultsAmong 1185 participants, 86 (7.3%) had GA at baseline, 120 (10.1%) developed GA during year 1, and 36 (3.0%) developed GA during year 2. Among 194 eyes evaluable for growth, the rate was 0.43 mm/yr (standard error [SE], ±0.03 mm/year). In multivariate analysis, the growth rate was 0.37 mm/year in eyes receiving bevacizumab and 0.49 mm/year in eyes receiving ranibizumab (difference, 0.11 mm/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.22; P = 0.03). Growth rate did not differ between eyes treated monthly and PRN (P = 0.85). Eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions had a lower growth rate than eyes with nonsubfoveal CNV lesions (difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.22; P = 0.03). Eyes with GA farther from the fovea had higher growth rates by 0.14 (95% CI, 0.01-27) mm/year for every millimeter farther from the fovea. The growth rate was 0.58 mm/year for eyes with predominantly classic lesions, 0.41 mm/year for eyes with minimally classic lesions, and 0.30 mm/year for eyes with occult only lesions (P < 0.01). The growth rate in eyes having a fellow eye with GA was higher by 0.13 mm/year (95% CI, 0.01-0.24; P = 0.03) than in eyes without GA in the fellow eye. Eyes with epiretinal membrane had a higher growth rate than eyes without epiretinal membrane (difference, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.30; P = 0.02).

conclusionsGeographic atrophy growth depends on several ocular factors. Ranibizumab may accelerate GA growth.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCohort StudiesComplement C3Complement Factor HFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGeographic AtrophyHigh-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 1HumansIntravitreal InjectionsMalePhotographyAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedARMS2 protein, humanBevacizumabCFH protein, humanComplement C3Complement Factor HHigh-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 1HTRA1 protein, humanProteinsRanibizumabSerine EndopeptidasesTLR3 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 3Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25542520
PMCPMC4372487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.