ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015
Comprehensive chronic laminar single-unit, multi-unit, and local field potential recording performance with planar single shank electrode arrays.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic alteration of CaBiomaterials · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Multi-omic spatially resolved analysis of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode arrays.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Aging diminishes interlaminar functional connectivity in the mouse cortical V1 and CA1 hippocampal regions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Monolithic three-dimensional neural probes from deterministic rolling of soft electronics.Nature electronics · 2025Article
- Electrochemical stability and neural recording with sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes subchronically in rat motor cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Functional Nanomaterials for Advanced Bioelectrode Interfaces: Recent Advances in Disease Detection and Metabolic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Foldable 3D opto-electro array for optogenetic neuromodulation and physiology recording.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Bacteria invade the brain following intracortical microelectrode implantation, inducing gut-brain axis disruption and contributing to reduced microelectrode performance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An ingestible bioimpedance sensing device for wireless monitoring of epithelial barriers.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Long-Term Neural Recording Performance of PEDOT/CNT/Dexamethasone Coated Electrode Array Implanted in Visual Cortex of Rats.Advanced nanobiomed research · 2025Article
- Enhanced Performance of Novel Amorphous Silicon Carbide Microelectrode Arrays in Rat Motor Cortex.Micromachines · 2025Article
- In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Longitudinal changes in electrophysiology and widefield calcium imaging following electrode implantation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Applications of 2D Nanomaterials in Neural Interface.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Comprehensive proteomic analysis of the differential expression of 62 proteins following intracortical microelectrode implantation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Corrigendum to "Platelets and Hemostatic Proteins are Co-Localized with Chronic Neuroinflammation Surrounding Implanted Intracortical Microelectrodes" [Acta Biomaterialia. Volume 166, August 2023, Pages 278-290].Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Planar amorphous silicon carbide microelectrode arrays for chronic recording in rat motor cortex.Biomaterials · 2024Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracortical electrode arrays that can record extracellular action potentials from small, targeted groups of neurons are critical for basic neuroscience research and emerging clinical applications. In general, these electrode devices suffer from reliability and variability issues, which have led to comparative studies of existing and emerging electrode designs to optimize performance. Comparisons of different chronic recording devices have been limited to single-unit (SU) activity and employed a bulk averaging approach treating brain architecture as homogeneous with respect to electrode distribution. NEW
methodIn this study, we optimize the methods and parameters to quantify evoked multi-unit (MU) and local field potential (LFP) recordings in eight mice visual cortices.
resultsThese findings quantify the large recording differences stemming from anatomical differences in depth and the layer dependent relative changes to SU and MU recording performance over 6-months. For example, performance metrics in Layer V and stratum pyramidale were initially higher than Layer II/III, but decrease more rapidly. On the other hand, Layer II/III maintained recording metrics longer. In addition, chronic changes at the level of layer IV are evaluated using visually evoked current source density. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): The use of MU and LFP activity for evaluation and tracking biological depth provides a more comprehensive characterization of the electrophysiological performance landscape of microelectrodes.
conclusionsA more extensive spatial and temporal insight into the chronic electrophysiological performance over time will help uncover the biological and mechanical failure mechanisms of the neural electrodes and direct future research toward the elucidation of design optimization for specific applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.