Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25541986›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Males and females contribute unequally to offspring genetic diversity in the polygynandrous mating system of wild boar.

Javier Pérez-González, Vânia Costa, Pedro Santos, Jon Slate, Juan Carranza, Pedro Fernández-Llario, Attila Zsolnai, Nuno M Monteiro, István Anton, József Buzgó and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pedigree-Based Genetic Diversity in the South African Boerboel Dog Breed.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Javier Pérez-GonzálezUngulate Research Unit, Cátedra de Recursos Cinegéticos y Piscícolas (CRCP), University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain; Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Biology and Ethology Unit, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain; Guardería Rural, Mancomunidad Integral de Municipios Centro (MIMC), Calamonte, Spain.
Vânia CostaCentro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto (CIBIO-UP), Vairão, Portugal.
Pedro SantosInstituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas (ICAAM), Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Jon SlateDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Juan CarranzaUngulate Research Unit, Cátedra de Recursos Cinegéticos y Piscícolas (CRCP), University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain; Biology and Ethology Unit, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Pedro Fernández-LlarioBiology and Ethology Unit, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain; Innovación en Gestión y Conservación de Ungulados S.L., Cáceres, Spain.
Attila ZsolnaiResearch Institute for Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Herceghalom, Hungary; University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Nuno M MonteiroCentro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto (CIBIO-UP), Vairão, Portugal; Centro de Investigação em Biomedicina (CEBIMED), Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.
István AntonResearch Institute for Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Herceghalom, Hungary.
József BuzgóForest Management and Wood Industry Share Company (SEFAG, Somogyi Erdő- és Fafeldolgozó Gazdaság), Kaposvár, Hungary.
Gyula VargaForest Management and Wood Industry Share Company (SEFAG, Somogyi Erdő- és Fafeldolgozó Gazdaság), Kaposvár, Hungary.
Albano Beja-PereiraCentro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto (CIBIO-UP), Vairão, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of genetic diversity across generations depends on both the number of reproducing males and females. Variance in reproductive success, multiple paternity and litter size can all affect the relative contributions of male and female parents to genetic variation of progeny. The mating system of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) has been described as polygynous, although evidence of multiple paternity in litters has been found. Using 14 microsatellite markers, we evaluated the contribution of males and females to genetic variation in the next generation in independent wild boar populations from the Iberian Peninsula and Hungary. Genetic contributions of males and females were obtained by distinguishing the paternal and maternal genetic component inherited by the progeny. We found that the paternally inherited genetic component of progeny was more diverse than the maternally inherited component. Simulations showed that this finding might be due to a sampling bias. However, after controlling for the bias by fitting both the genetic diversity in the adult population and the number of reproductive individuals in the models, paternally inherited genotypes remained more diverse than those inherited maternally. Our results suggest new insights into how promiscuous mating systems can help maintain genetic variation.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationReproductionAnimalsFemaleMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsSex CharacteristicsSexual Behavior, AnimalSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID25541986
PMCPMC4277350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.