Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25541708›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2014

Statin use and cognitive function: population-based observational study with long-term follow-up.

Hanneke Joosten, Sipke T Visser, Marlise E van Eersel, Ron T Gansevoort, Henk J G Bilo, Joris P Slaets, Gerbrand J Izaks

Erratum issuedFull text readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The efficacy of statins in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanneke JoostenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Internal medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sipke T VisserUniversity of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics (PE2), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marlise E van EerselUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ron T GansevoortUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Internal medicine, Division of Nephrology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henk J G BiloUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Internal medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal medicine, Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Joris P SlaetsUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gerbrand J IzaksUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the association between statin use and cognitive function. Cognitive function was measured with the Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT; worst score, 0; best score, 175 points) and the Visual Association Test (VAT; low performance, 0-10; high performance, 11-12 points) in an observational study that included 4,095 community-dwelling participants aged 35-82 years. Data on statin use were obtained from a computerized pharmacy database. Analysis were done for the total cohort and subsamples matched on cardiovascular risk (N = 1232) or propensity score for statin use (N = 3609). We found that a total of 904 participants (10%) used a statin. Statin users were older than non-users: mean age (SD) 61 (10) vs. 52 (11) years (p<0.001). The median duration of statin use was 3.8 (interquartile range, 1.6-4.5) years. Unadjusted, statin users had worse cognitive performance than non-users. The mean RFFT score (SD) in statin users and non-users was 58 (23) and 72 (26) points, respectively (p<0.001). VAT performance was high in 261 (29%) statin users and 1351 (43%) non-users (p<0.001). However, multiple regression analysis did not show a significant association of RFFT score with statin use (B, -0.82; 95%CI, -2.77 to 1.14; p = 0.41) nor with statin solubility, statin dose or duration of statin use. Statin users with high doses or long-term use had similar cognitive performance as non-users. This was found in persons with low as well as high cardiovascular risk, and in younger as well as older subjects. Also, the mean RFFT score per quintile of propensity score for statin use was comparable for statin users and non-users. Similar results were found for the VAT score as outcome measure. In conclusion, statin use was not associated with cognitive function. This was independent of statin dose or duration of statin use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCognitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25541708
PMCPMC4277319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.