Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25540985›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Rapid cytometric antibiotic susceptibility testing utilizing adaptive multidimensional statistical metrics.

Tzu-Hsueh Huang, Xinghai Ning, Xiaojian Wang, Niren Murthy, Yih-Ling Tzeng, Robert M Dickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. FAST: Rapid determinations of antibiotic susceptibility phenotypes using label-free cytometry.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tzu-Hsueh HuangSchool of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia 30305-0400, United States.
Xinghai Ning
Xiaojian Wang
Niren Murthy
Yih-Ling Tzeng
Robert M Dickson

Funding

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility determination of bacterial pathogensR01AI107116 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DICKSON, ROBERT M, TZENG, YIH-LING · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
Maltodextrin based antibioticsR21AI098799 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MURTHY, NIREN · 2012 to 2013
$436k
Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility determination of bacterial pathogensR56AI107116 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DICKSON, ROBERT M, TZENG, YIH-LING · 2013 to 2013
$379k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI107116NIAID NIH HHS R01AI107116NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI098799NIAID NIH HHS R21AI098799NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI107116NIAID NIH HHS R56AI107116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry holds promise to accelerate antibiotic susceptibility determinations; however, without robust multidimensional statistical analysis, general discrimination criteria have remained elusive. In this study, a new statistical method, probability binning signature quadratic form (PB-sQF), was developed and applied to analyze flow cytometric data of bacterial responses to antibiotic exposure. Both sensitive lab strains (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and a multidrug resistant, clinically isolated strain (E. coli) were incubated with the bacteria-targeted dye, maltohexaose-conjugated IR786, and each of many bactericidal or bacteriostatic antibiotics to identify changes induced around corresponding minimum inhibition concentrations (MIC). The antibiotic-induced damages were monitored by flow cytometry after 1-h incubation through forward scatter, side scatter, and fluorescence channels. The 3-dimensional differences between the flow cytometric data of the no-antibiotic treated bacteria and the antibiotic-treated bacteria were characterized by PB-sQF into a 1-dimensional linear distance. A 99% confidence level was established by statistical bootstrapping for each antibiotic-bacteria pair. For the susceptible E. coli strain, statistically significant increments from this 99% confidence level were observed from 1/16x MIC to 1x MIC for all the antibiotics. The same increments were recorded for P. aeruginosa, which has been reported to cause difficulty in flow-based viability tests. For the multidrug resistant E. coli, significant distances from control samples were observed only when an effective antibiotic treatment was utilized. Our results suggest that a rapid and robust antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) can be constructed by statistically characterizing the differences between sample and control flow cytometric populations, even in a label-free scheme with scattered light alone. These distances vs paired controls coupled with rigorous statistical confidence limits offer a new path toward investigating initial biological responses, screening for drugs, and shortening time to result in antimicrobial sensitivity testing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFlow CytometryHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25540985
PMCPMC4317060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.