ReviewAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2014
Adjuvant therapies for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.
Review in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transdermal rivastigmine for HIV-associated cognitive impairment: A randomized pilot study.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Moderate to severe HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment: A randomized placebo-controlled trial of lithium.Medicine · 2016Trial
- Reduction of soluble CD163, substance P, programmed death 1 and inflammatory markers: phase 1B trial of aprepitant in HIV-1-infected adults.AIDS (London, England) · 2015Trial
- Article
- Update on Central Nervous System Effects of HIV in Adolescents and Young Adults.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2023Review
- Aerobic Exercise in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- HIV-1 and drug abuse comorbidity: Lessons learned from the animal models of NeuroHIV.Neuroscience letters · 2021Review
- Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Opioid Modulation of Neuronal Iron and Potential Contributions to NeuroHIV.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition rescues sex-dependent contextual fear memory deficit in human immunodeficiency virus-1 transgenic mice.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Article
- Opioid and chemokine regulation of cortical synaptodendritic damage in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.Brain research · 2019Review
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in HIV: Possible Roles During HAND and Inflammation.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2018Review
- Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.JCI insight · 2017Article
- Pharmacologic rationale for the NK1R antagonist, aprepitant as adjunctive therapy in HIV.Journal of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Physical Activity Affects Brain Integrity in HIV+ Individuals.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2015Article
- Article
- Optimal treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: myths and reality. A critical review.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) is a frequent and heterogeneous complication of HIV, affecting nearly 50% of infected individuals in the combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) era. This is a particularly devastating statistic because the diagnosis of HAND confers an increased risk of HIV-associated morbidity and mortality in affected patients. While cART is helpful in the treatment of the more severe forms of HAND, there is a therapeutic gap in the milder forms of HAND, where cART is less effective. Multiple adjuvant therapies with various mechanisms of action have been studied (N-methyl D-aspartate [NMDA]-receptor antagonists, MAO-B inhibitors, tetracycline-class antibiotics, and others), but none have shown a clear positive effect in HAND. While this lack of efficacy may be because the appropriate therapeutic targets have not yet been determined, we aimed to discuss that study results may also influenced by clinical trial design.
methodsThis report is a systematic review of clinical trials of adjuvant therapies for HAND performed from January 1996 through June 2014.
resultsPossible drawbacks in study design, including lack of standardized case definitions, poorly defined target populations, inappropriate dose selection and measurable outcomes, and brief study durations may have masked true underlying mechanistic effects of previously investigated adjuvant therapies for HAND in specific patient populations.
conclusionsA proposal for streamlining and maximizing the likelihood of success in future clinical studies using a 'learning and confirming' investigational paradigm, incorporating stronger adaptive Phase I/II study designs, computerized modeling, and population/goal of treatment-specific Phase III clinical trials is presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.