ArticleDental research journal2014
Autogenous wisdom tooth transplantation: A case series with 6-9 months follow-up.
Article in Dental research journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel full digital workflow for dental autotransplantation: surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Autogenous Transplantation of Teeth Across Clinical Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Reconsidering some standards in immediate autotransplantation of teeth: Case report with 2-year follow-up.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Pre- and peri-operative factors influence autogenous tooth transplantation healing in insufficient bone sites.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Autotransplantation of third molars: a literature review and preliminary protocols.British dental journal · 2020Review
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Third Molar Extraction: Systematic Review of Recent Data.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Third Molar Autotransplantation: An Alternative to Dental Implant - 9 Years Follow up of a Case.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tooth transplantation can be considered a valid and predictable treatment option for rehabilitating young patients with permanent teeth loss. This study presents several cases of successful autogenous tooth transplantation with a 6-9 months follow-up. Tooth auto-transplantation can be considered a reasonable option for replacing missing teeth when a donor tooth is available. The auto-transplantation of a right mandibular third molar with compromised function and esthetics to replace the residual roots resulting from coronal destruction due to extensive carious lesion of the second molar in the same quadrant as shown in the presented cases can result a viable treatment alternative especially in a young patient that cannot undergo dental implant therapy. Transplantation of mature third molar seems to be a promising method for replacing a lost permanent molar tooth and restoring esthetics and function. This clinical procedure showed excellent functional and esthetical long-term results in the analyzed cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25540668PMC4275642W1509315043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.