ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2014
The effect of altering the mechanical loading environment on the expression of bone regenerating molecules in cases of distraction osteogenesis.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Biomechanical Proof-of-Concept Study of Scaffold-Augmented Distraction Osteogenesis Using 3D-Printed Hyperelastic Bone™ in a Rabbit Tibial Lengthening Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
- Enhanced Bone Regeneration by Schwann Cells through Coupling of Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis via β-catenin signaling in a Preclinical Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The accordion technique did not improve bone healing in a mouse model of distraction osteogenesis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of flat ridge rehabilitation using an intraoral custom-made distraction device at four weeks versus eight weeks and its impact on dental implant efficacy: A comparative study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Application of chemical factors for acceleration of consolidation phase of the distraction osteogenesis: a scoping review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2023Article
- Effects of highly selective sensory/motor nerve injury on bone metabolism and bone remodeling in rats.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022Article
- Wnt3a involved in the mechanical loading on improvement of bone remodeling and angiogenesis in a postmenopausal osteoporosis mouse model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019Article
- Mechanical solutions to salvage failed distraction osteogenesis in large bone defect management.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Assessment of the effect of systemic delivery of sclerostin antibodies on Wnt signaling in distraction osteogenesis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2018Article
- Can Spatiotemporal Fluoride (Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
- The biology of bone lengthening.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2016Review
- A Tunable Silk Hydrogel Device for Studying Limb Regeneration in Adult Xenopus Laevis.PloS one · 2016Article
- Regulation of Long Bone Growth in Vertebrates; It Is Time to Catch Up.Endocrine reviews · 2015Review
- Infected nonunion of tibia.Indian journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a surgical technique where gradual and controlled separation of two bony fragments following an osteotomy leads to the induction of new bone formation in the distracted gap. DO is used for limb lengthening, correction of bony deformities, and the replacement of bone loss secondary to infection, trauma, and tumors. Although DO gives satisfactory results in most cases, one major drawback of this technique is the prolonged period of time the external fixator has to be kept on until the newly formed bone consolidates thus leading to numerous complications. Numerous attempts at accelerating bone formation during DO have been reported. One specific approach is manipulation of the mechanical environment during DO by applying changes in the standard protocol of distraction. Attempts at changing this mechanical environment led to mixed results. Increasing the rate or applying acute distraction, led to poor bone formation in the distracted zone. On the other hand, the addition of compressive forces (such as weight bearing, alternating distraction with compression or by over-lengthening, and then shortening) has been reported to increase bone formation. It still remains unclear why these alterations may lead to changes in bone formation. While the cellular and molecular changes occurring during the standard DO protocol, specifically increased expression of transforming growth factor-β1, platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and bone morphogenic proteins have been extensively investigated, the literature is sparse on the changes occurring when this protocol is altered. It is the purpose of this article to review the pertinent literature on the changes in the expression of various proteins and molecules as a result of changes in the mechanical loading technique in DO and try to define potential future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.