Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25540639›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2014

The effect of altering the mechanical loading environment on the expression of bone regenerating molecules in cases of distraction osteogenesis.

Mohammad M Alzahrani, Emad A Anam, Asim M Makhdom, Isabelle Villemure, Reggie Charles Hamdy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wnt3a involved in the mechanical loading on improvement of bone remodeling and angiogenesis in a postmenopausal osteoporosis mouse model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can Spatiotemporal Fluoride (Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017
    Article
  11. The biology of bone lengthening.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Infected nonunion of tibia.Indian journal of orthopaedics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad M AlzahraniDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal Children Hospital, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Dammam , Dammam , Saudi Arabia.
Emad A AnamDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal Children Hospital, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia.
Asim M MakhdomDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal Children Hospital, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia.
Isabelle VillemureDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montreal , Montreal, QC , Canada ; Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center , Montreal, QC , Canada.
Reggie Charles HamdyDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal Children Hospital, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada.
McGill University · CAKing Abdulaziz University · SAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAPolytechnique Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a surgical technique where gradual and controlled separation of two bony fragments following an osteotomy leads to the induction of new bone formation in the distracted gap. DO is used for limb lengthening, correction of bony deformities, and the replacement of bone loss secondary to infection, trauma, and tumors. Although DO gives satisfactory results in most cases, one major drawback of this technique is the prolonged period of time the external fixator has to be kept on until the newly formed bone consolidates thus leading to numerous complications. Numerous attempts at accelerating bone formation during DO have been reported. One specific approach is manipulation of the mechanical environment during DO by applying changes in the standard protocol of distraction. Attempts at changing this mechanical environment led to mixed results. Increasing the rate or applying acute distraction, led to poor bone formation in the distracted zone. On the other hand, the addition of compressive forces (such as weight bearing, alternating distraction with compression or by over-lengthening, and then shortening) has been reported to increase bone formation. It still remains unclear why these alterations may lead to changes in bone formation. While the cellular and molecular changes occurring during the standard DO protocol, specifically increased expression of transforming growth factor-β1, platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and bone morphogenic proteins have been extensively investigated, the literature is sparse on the changes occurring when this protocol is altered. It is the purpose of this article to review the pertinent literature on the changes in the expression of various proteins and molecules as a result of changes in the mechanical loading technique in DO and try to define potential future research directions.

Indexed as

bone regenerating moleculebone regenerationdistraction osteogensisgrowth factormechanical loading

Identifiers

PMID25540639
PMCPMC4261813
OpenAlexW2078156237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.