Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25540366›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Upon intranasal vesicular stomatitis virus infection, astrocytes in the olfactory bulb are important interferon Beta producers that protect from lethal encephalitis.

Claudia N Detje, Stefan Lienenklaus, Chintan Chhatbar, Julia Spanier, Chittappen K Prajeeth, Claudia Soldner, Michael G Tovey, Dirk Schlüter, Siegfried Weiss, Martin Stangel and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Abortive and productive infection of CNS cell types following in vivo delivery of VSV.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. GluiScience · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia N DetjeInstitute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, a joint venture between the H annover Medical School and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Hannover, Germany.
Stefan LienenklausMolecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Chintan ChhatbarInstitute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, a joint venture between the H annover Medical School and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Hannover, Germany.
Julia SpanierInstitute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, a joint venture between the H annover Medical School and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Hannover, Germany.
Chittappen K PrajeethClinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Claudia SoldnerInstitute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, a joint venture between the H annover Medical School and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Hannover, Germany.
Michael G ToveyLaboratory of Biotechnology Applied Pharmacology, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Cachan Cedex, France.
Dirk SchlüterInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany Organ-Specific Immune Regulation, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Siegfried WeissMolecular Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Martin StangelClinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ulrich KalinkeInstitute for Experimental Infection Research, TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, a joint venture between the H annover Medical School and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Hannover, Germany ulrich.kalinke@twincore.de.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECenter for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research · DEÉcole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay · FROtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPreviously we found that following intranasal (i.n.) infection with neurotropic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) type I interferon receptor (IFNAR) triggering of neuroectodermal cells was critically required to constrain intracerebral virus spread. To address whether locally active IFN-β was induced proximally, we studied spatiotemporal conditions of VSV-mediated IFN-β induction. To this end, we performed infection studies with IFN-β reporter mice. One day after intravenous (i.v.) VSV infection, luciferase induction was detected in lymph nodes. Upon i.n. infection, luciferase induction was discovered at similar sites with delayed kinetics, whereas on days 3 and 4 postinfection enhanced luciferase expression additionally was detected in the foreheads of reporter mice. A detailed analysis of cell type-specific IFN-β reporter mice revealed that within the olfactory bulb IFN-β was expressed by neuroectodermal cells, primarily by astrocytes and to a lesser extent by neurons. Importantly, locally induced type I IFN triggered distal parts of the brain as indicated by the analysis of ISRE-eGFP mice which after i.n. VSV infection showed enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) expression throughout the brain. Compared to wild-type mice, IFN-β(-/-) mice showed increased mortality to i.n. VSV infection, whereas upon i.v. infection no such differences were detected highlighting the biological significance of intracerebrally expressed IFN-β. In conclusion, upon i.n. VSV instillation, IFN-β responses mounted by astrocytes within the olfactory bulb critically contribute to the antiviral defense by stimulating distal IFN-β-negative brain areas and thus arresting virus spread. IMPORTANCE: The central nervous system has long been considered an immune privileged site. More recently, it became evident that specialized immune mechanisms are active within the brain to control pathogens. Previously, we showed that virus, which entered the brain via the olfactory route, was arrested within the olfactory bulb by a type I IFN-dependent mechanism. Since peripheral type I IFN would not readily cross the blood-brain barrier and within the brain thus far no abundant type I IFN responses have been detected, here we addressed from where locally active IFN originated from. We found that upon intranasal VSV instillation, primarily astrocytes, and to a lesser extent neurons, were stimulated within the olfactory bulb to mount IFN-β responses that also activated and protected distal brain areas. Our results are surprising because in other infection models astrocytes have not yet been identified as major type I IFN producers.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesDisease Models, AnimalEncephalitis, ViralGene Expression ProfilingGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInterferon-betaLuciferasesMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNeuronsOlfactory BulbRhabdoviridae InfectionsSurvival AnalysisVesiculovirusenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInterferon-betaLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID25540366
PMCPMC4325722
OpenAlexW2009904875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.