Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25540223›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Parallel processing streams for motor output and sensory prediction during action preparation.

Max-Philipp Stenner, Markus Bauer, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Patrick Haggard, Raymond J Dolan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gain control in the sensorimotor system.Current opinion in physiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. How Movement Modulates Hearing.Annual review of neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Max-Philipp StennerWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; max-philipp.stenner@med.ovgu.de.
Markus BauerWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Hans-Jochen HeinzeDepartment of Neurology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany;
Patrick HaggardInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 098362Wellcome Trust 098362/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory consequences of one's own actions are perceived as less intense than identical, externally generated stimuli. This is generally taken as evidence for sensory prediction of action consequences. Accordingly, recent theoretical models explain this attenuation by an anticipatory modulation of sensory processing prior to stimulus onset (Roussel et al. 2013) or even action execution (Brown et al. 2013). Experimentally, prestimulus changes that occur in anticipation of self-generated sensations are difficult to disentangle from more general effects of stimulus expectation, attention and task load (performing an action). Here, we show that an established manipulation of subjective agency over a stimulus leads to a predictive modulation in sensory cortex that is independent of these factors. We recorded magnetoencephalography while subjects performed a simple action with either hand and judged the loudness of a tone caused by the action. Effector selection was manipulated by subliminal motor priming. Compatible priming is known to enhance a subjective experience of agency over a consequent stimulus (Chambon and Haggard 2012). In line with this effect on subjective agency, we found stronger sensory attenuation when the action that caused the tone was compatibly primed. This perceptual effect was reflected in a transient phase-locked signal in auditory cortex before stimulus onset and motor execution. Interestingly, this sensory signal emerged at a time when the hemispheric lateralization of motor signals in M1 indicated ongoing effector selection. Our findings confirm theoretical predictions of a sensory modulation prior to self-generated sensations and support the idea that a sensory prediction is generated in parallel to motor output (Walsh and Haggard 2010), before an efference copy becomes available.

Indexed as

MovementPsychomotor PerformanceAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalFemaleFunctional LateralityHandHumansMaleSensorimotor Cortexagencylateralized readiness potentialmotor primingsensory attenuationsensory prediction

Identifiers

PMID25540223
PMCPMC4359987
OpenAlexW2091073766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.