Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25540188›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2015

Mucosal microbiome in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis.

K Hijazi, T Lowe, C Meharg, S H Berry, J Foley, G L Hold

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Current status and future prospects of stomatology research.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Detection and Analysis of the Oral Flora in Patients with Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Association Between Oral Health and Skin Disease.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K HijaziSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Medical and Dental Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK k.hijazi@abdn.ac.uk.
T LoweMaxillofacial Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
C MehargSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
S H BerrySchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Applied Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
J FoleySchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Medical and Dental Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK Edinburgh Dental Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
G L HoldSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Applied Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is the most common disease affecting oral mucosae. Etiology is unknown, but several factors have been implicated, all of which influence the composition of microbiota residing on oral mucosae, which in turn modulates immunity and thereby affects disease progression. Although no individual pathogens have been conclusively shown to be causative agents of RAS, imbalanced composition of the oral microbiota may play a key role. In this study, we sought to determine composition profiles of bacterial microbiota in the oral mucosa associated with RAS. Using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the most abundant bacterial populations residing on healthy and ulcerated mucosae in patients with RAS (recruited using highly stringent criteria) and no associated medical conditions; we also compared these to the bacterial microbiota of healthy controls (HCs). Phylum-level diversity comparisons revealed decreased Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria in ulcerated sites, as compared with healthy sites in RAS patients, and no differences between RAS patients with healthy sites and HCs. Genus-level analysis demonstrated higher abundance of total Bacteroidales in RAS patients with healthy sites over HCs. Porphyromonadaceae comprising species associated with periodontal disease and Veillonellaceae predominated in ulcerated sites over HCs, while no quantitative differences of these families were observed between healthy sites in RAS patients and HCs. Streptococcaceae comprising species associated with oral health predominated in HCs over ulcerated sites but not in HCs over healthy sites in RAS patients. This study demonstrates that mucosal microbiome changes in patients with idiopathic RAS--namely, increased Bacteroidales species in mucosae of RAS patients not affected by active ulceration. While these changes suggest a microbial role in initiation of RAS, this study does not provide data on causality. Within this limitation, the study contributes to the understanding of the potential role of mucosal microbiome changes in oral mucosal disease.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdolescentAdultBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacteroidaceaeCase-Control StudiesFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaPorphyromonasProteobacteriachronic diseasehigh-throughput DNA sequencinghost-pathogen relationsmicrobiotaoral mucosaoral ulcer

Identifiers

PMID25540188
PMCPMC4541092
OpenAlexW2016695291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.