ArticleBMC health services research2014
Billing and insurance-related administrative costs in United States' health care: synthesis of micro-costing evidence.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses.PLoS medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Mandatory Value-Based Payment Programs and Hospital Administrative Costs.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Assessing Eligibility for Anticancer Drug Health Insurance Reimbursement Using Large Language Models: Benchmark Development and Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Analysis of the current situation and influencing factors of burnout of medical insurance specialists in public hospitals in Guangxi, China under the background of the "Sanming Model" reform- cases of healthcare system reform from low and middle income regions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Trends in hospital administrative costs: urban-rural disparities, barriers, and reduction strategies.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Learning health system strategies in the AI era.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Availability of consistent, reliable, and actionable public data on US hospital administrative expenses.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- The Effect of Length of Stay in Hospital on Patients' Health Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Billing Practices and Clinical Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Household Health Care Payments Under Rate Setting, Spending Growth Target, and Single-Payer Policies.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for Common Pediatric Orthopedic Procedures: From 2000 to 2022.Cureus · 2024Article
- Active steps to reduce administrative spending associated with financial transactions in US health care.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Between 2000 and 2020, Reimbursement for Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery Decreased by 30.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Bending the Cost Growth Curve and Expanding Coverage: Lessons from Germany's All-Payer System A Tribute to Uwe Reinhardt.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- The Burden of Physicians' Administrative Workload Affects Clinical and Scientific Mentoring.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2019Article
- Article
- Refinement of the Affordable Care Act: A Progressive Perspective.Annual review of medicine · 2018Review
- California Universal Health Care Bill: an economic stimulus and life-saving proposal.Lancet (London, England) · 2017Article
- Diabetic Eye Screening: Knowledge and Perspectives from Providers and Patients.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe United States' multiple-payer health care system requires substantial effort and costs for administration, with billing and insurance-related (BIR) activities comprising a large but incompletely characterized proportion. A number of studies have quantified BIR costs for specific health care sectors, using micro-costing techniques. However, variation in the types of payers, providers, and BIR activities across studies complicates estimation of system-wide costs. Using a consistent and comprehensive definition of BIR (including both public and private payers, all providers, and all types of BIR activities), we synthesized and updated available micro-costing evidence in order to estimate total and added BIR costs for the U.S. health care system in 2012.
methodsWe reviewed BIR micro-costing studies across healthcare sectors. For physician practices, hospitals, and insurers, we estimated the % BIR using existing research and publicly reported data, re-calculated to a standard and comprehensive definition of BIR where necessary. We found no data on % BIR in other health services or supplies settings, so extrapolated from known sectors. We calculated total BIR costs in each sector as the product of 2012 U.S. national health expenditures and the percentage of revenue used for BIR. We estimated "added" BIR costs by comparing total BIR costs in each sector to those observed in existing, simplified financing systems (Canada's single payer system for providers, and U.S. Medicare for insurers). Due to uncertainty in inputs, we performed sensitivity analyses.
resultsBIR costs in the U.S. health care system totaled approximately $471 ($330 - $597) billion in 2012. This includes $70 ($54 - $76) billion in physician practices, $74 ($58 - $94) billion in hospitals, an estimated $94 ($47 - $141) billion in settings providing other health services and supplies, $198 ($154 - $233) billion in private insurers, and $35 ($17 - $52) billion in public insurers. Compared to simplified financing, $375 ($254 - $507) billion, or 80%, represents the added BIR costs of the current multi-payer system.
conclusionsA simplified financing system in the U.S. could result in cost savings exceeding $350 billion annually, nearly 15% of health care spending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.