Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25539877›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2015

Structured assessment for prospective identification of safety signals in electronic medical records: evaluation in the health improvement network.

S Cederholm, G Hill, A Asiimwe, A Bate, F Bhayat, G Persson Brobert, T Bergvall, D Ansell, K Star, G N Norén

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

S CederholmUppsala Monitoring Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Box 1051, SE-75140, Uppsala, Sweden.
G Hill
A Asiimwe
A Bate
F Bhayat
G Persson Brobert
T Bergvall
D Ansell
K Star
G N Norén
Uppsala Monitoring Centre · SEBayer (Germany) · DEEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBHealth Data Research UK · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBTakeda (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacovigilance signal detection largely relies on individual case reports, but longitudinal health data are being explored as complementary information sources. Research to date has focused on the ability of epidemiological methods to distinguish established adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from unrelated adverse events.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate a process for structured clinical and epidemiological assessment of temporally associated drugs and medical events in electronic medical records.

methodsPairs of drugs and medical events were selected for review on the basis of their temporal association according to a calibrated self-controlled cohort analysis in The Health Improvement Network. Six assessors trained in pharmacovigilance and/or epidemiology evaluated seven drugs each, with up to 20 medical events per drug. A pre-specified questionnaire considered aspects related to the nature of the temporal pattern, demographic features of the cohort, concomitant medicines, earlier signs and symptoms, and possible confounding by underlying disease. This informed a classification of drug-event pairs as known ADRs, meriting further evaluation, or dismissed.

resultsThe number of temporally associated medical events per drug ranged from 11 to 307 (median 50) for the 42 selected drugs. Out of the 509 relevant drug-event combinations subjected to the assessment, 127 (25 %) were classified as known ADRs. Ninety-one (24 %) of the remaining pairs were classified as potential signals meriting further evaluation and 291 (76 %) were dismissed. Suggestive temporal patterns and lack of clear alternative explanations were the most common reasons that drug-event pairs were classified as meriting further evaluation. Earlier signs and symptoms and confounding by the underlying disease were the most common reasons that drug-event pairs were dismissed.

conclusionsExploratory analysis of electronic medical records can detect important potential safety signals. However, effective signal detection requires that statistical signal detection be combined with clinical and epidemiological review to achieve an acceptable false positive rate.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25539877
PMCPMC4302222
OpenAlexW1967867492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.