Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25539815›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2015

CD8 T cell tolerance to a tumor-associated self-antigen is reversed by CD4 T cells engineered to express the same T cell receptor.

Sara Ghorashian, Pedro Veliça, Ignatius Chua, Anne-Marie McNicol, Ben Carpenter, Angelika Holler, Emma Nicholson, Maryam Ahmadi, Mathias Zech, Shao-An Xue and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New Strategies in Engineering T-cell Receptor Gene-Modified T cells to More Effectively Target Malignancies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara GhorashianInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; Transplantation Immunology Group, Department of Haematology, Division of Cancer Studies, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; and.
Pedro VeliçaInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; Transplantation Immunology Group, Department of Haematology, Division of Cancer Studies, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; and.
Ignatius ChuaInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Anne-Marie McNicolInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Ben CarpenterTransplantation Immunology Group, Department of Haematology, Division of Cancer Studies, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; and.
Angelika HollerInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Emma NicholsonInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Maryam AhmadiInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Mathias ZechInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Shao-An XueInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Wolfgang UckertInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Emma MorrisInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom;
Ronjon ChakravertyTransplantation Immunology Group, Department of Haematology, Division of Cancer Studies, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; and.
Hans J StaussInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom; h.stauss@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBLondon Cancer · GBMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK A11995Cancer Research UK A7189Medical Research Council G0700568Medical Research Council G0701311Medical Research Council G0802345Medical Research Council G0900397Medical Research Council G0902209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ag receptors used for cancer immunotherapy are often directed against tumor-associated Ags also expressed in normal tissues. Targeting of such Ags can result in unwanted autoimmune attack of normal tissues or induction of tolerance in therapeutic T cells. We used a murine model to study the phenotype and function of T cells redirected against the murine double minute protein 2 (MDM2), a tumor-associated Ag that shows low expression in many normal tissues. Transfer of MDM2-TCR-engineered T cells into bone marrow chimeric mice revealed that Ag recognition in hematopoietic tissues maintained T cell function, whereas presentation of MDM2 in nonhematopoietic tissues caused reduced effector function. TCR-engineered CD8(+) T cells underwent rapid turnover, downmodulated CD8 expression, and lost cytotoxic function. We found that MDM2-TCR-engineered CD4(+) T cells provided help and restored cytotoxic function of CD8(+) T cells bearing the same TCR. Although the introduction of the CD8 coreceptor enhanced the ability of CD4(+) T cells to recognize MDM2 in vitro, the improved self-antigen recognition abolished their ability to provide helper function in vivo. The data indicate that the same class I-restricted TCR responsible for Ag recognition and tolerance induction in CD8(+) T cells can, in the absence of the CD8 coreceptor, elicit CD4 T cell help and partially reverse tolerance. Thus MHC class I-restricted CD4(+) T cells may enhance the efficacy of therapeutic TCR-engineered CD8(+) T cells and can be readily generated with the same TCR.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceAdoptive TransferAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell CommunicationCytotoxicity, ImmunologicGene ExpressionImmunophenotypingMiceMice, TransgenicPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Receptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantigensProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Receptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25539815
PMCPMC4298128
OpenAlexW2167174298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.