Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25539350›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2015

The impact of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the remodeling of acellular dermal matrices in staged, prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Terence M Myckatyn, Jaime A Cavallo, Ketan Sharma, Noopur Gangopadhyay, Jason R Dudas, Andres A Roma, Sara Baalman, Marissa M Tenenbaum, Brent D Matthews, Corey R Deeken

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of breast cancer · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terence M MyckatynSt. Louis, Mo.; and Cleveland, Ohio From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic.
Jaime A Cavallo
Ketan Sharma
Noopur Gangopadhyay
Jason R Dudas
Andres A Roma
Sara Baalman
Marissa M Tenenbaum
Brent D Matthews
Corey R Deeken
EES Research (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CER MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT AWARD KM1KM1CA156708 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000448NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156708NCI NIH HHS KM1CA156708NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P30CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn acellular dermal matrix will typically incorporate, in time, with the overlying mastectomy skin flap. This remodeling process may be adversely impacted in patients who require chemotherapy and radiation, which influence neovascularization and cellular proliferation.

methodsMultiple biopsy specimens were procured from 86 women (n = 94 breasts) undergoing exchange of a tissue expander for a breast implant. These were divided by biopsy location: submuscular capsule (control) as well as superiorly, centrally, and inferiorly along the paramedian acellular dermis. Specimens were assessed for cellular infiltration, cell type, fibrous encapsulation, scaffold degradation, extracellular matrix deposition, neovascularization, mean composite remodeling score, and type I and III collagen. Patients were compared based on five oncologic treatment groups: no adjuvant therapy (untreated), neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation, and chemotherapy with or without radiation.

resultsBiopsy specimens were procured 45 to 1805 days after implantation and demonstrated a significant reduction in type I collagen over time. Chemotherapy adversely impacted fibrous encapsulation (p = 0.03). Chemotherapy with or without radiation adversely impacted type I collagen (p = 0.02), cellular infiltration (p < 0.01), extracellular matrix deposition (p < 0.04), and neovascularization (p < 0.01). Radiation exacerbated the adverse impact of chemotherapy for several remodeling parameters. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also caused a reduction in type I (p = 0.01) and III collagen (p = 0.05), extracellular matrix deposition (p = 0.03), and scaffold degradation (p = 0.02).

conclusionChemotherapy and radiation therapy limit acellular dermal matrix remodeling. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationAcellular DermisAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25539350
PMCPMC4515029
OpenAlexW2316812473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.